• ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    6 hours ago

    It’s even trickier with EVs.

    On the one hand you can charge your EV at home and no one knows about it.

    On the other, you can’t pay for a public charger with cash, there’s always a trail. Cars have unique identifiers that are communicated to the charger when connected. Each time you charge in public they know exactly who are you and what car it is.

  • YoSoySnekBoi@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    62
    ·
    17 hours ago

    The very worst offender is Nissan. The Japanese car manufacturer admits in their privacy policy to collecting a wide range of information, including sexual activity, health diagnosis data, and genetic data — but doesn’t specify how. They say they can share and sell consumers’ “preferences, characteristics, psychological trends, predispositions, behavior, attitudes, intelligence, abilities, and aptitudes” to data brokers, law enforcement, and other third parties.

    What the actual fuck

      • birdwing@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        15 hours ago

        and not before it was produced? press x to doubt they actually removed it… If there’s no independent research and we can’t have the CEO’s own data, then take it with a big grain of salt

        • Grass@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          15 hours ago

          I’m not sure what you mean, but I meant you could no longer find the bit about collecting sex related data on the nissan site after mozilla made that article. I read some of them before and I’m not 100% but I’m pretty sure I read that section, but when I shared the article with people it was gone from the car maker site by then.

          • sep@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            8 hours ago

            If you have the url. Have you looked for it on the wayback internet archive?

  • CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    79
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Subaru states that by being a passenger, you are considered a user — and by being a user, you have consented to their privacy policy. Several car brands also note that it is a driver’s responsibility to tell passengers about the vehicle’s privacy policies.

    No way that holds up in court. But in what situation would that appear in court unless someone has money to burn?

    • FEIN@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      11 hours ago

      everytime WE get into a car with our friends we ALWAYS read the privacy policy aloud to them right guys

    • FireRetardant@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      16 hours ago

      This kind of shit is what makes me not want an EV, that and I guess the ease of repair but that could change with proper regulation and resources. I’m all for EVs but my current relatively effecient ICE car doesn’t spy on me and that’s important as well.

        • FireRetardant@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Thats kinda my point. If my current car dies I’d like to replace it with an EV, but if even the ones used and 5 years old have this shit I’m not sure I’d want to compromise my privacy like that. My only options would likely be used plug in electric hybrids or early models of EVs that will likely need battery replacements/upgrades.

        • pomegranatefern@sh.itjust.worksOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          14 hours ago

          It sort of has something to do with EVs, in that it’s hard to find EVs made before this was standard, so if you’re looking for cars without it it’s hard to find one that doesn’t have an ICE engine.

          (Where cars aren’t avoidable, I do prefer they be electric, as, I’m sure, do many, but the privacy concerns are apparently very real.)

          • bearboiblake@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            7 hours ago

            If it makes you feel better, EVs aren’t a real solution to the problems we face anyways, public transport was always the solution and EVs was a way to get consumers to keep focusing on individualism and consumerism to solve societal problems.

            • FireRetardant@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 hours ago

              Rural places and bigots will still need or want personal cars. Some things like a trades work van or delivery service will still need a car/truck. These might as well be developed as electric. EVs are not the solution to our transportation and environmental issues but they are part of it.

            • phutatorius@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 hours ago

              EVs aren’t the perfect solution. But they’re less bad than ICE vehicles, and are a good interim measure unless/until public transport becomes more viable.

              Don’t let the best get in the way of the good enough for now. It’s OK to be in favor of two things.

            • hobovision@mander.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 hours ago

              Cars will always be the best choice for many many trips for many many kinds of people. Cities are most efficient but not everyone can be in one, and public transit doesn’t work in farmland. We need both. EVs is a way to reduce the use of fossil fuels in transportation. We don’t have time to wait to densify every city and build out good transit networks, that will take decades. EVs have real benefits today. It just sucks modern cars are nightmares.

              • msage@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                5 hours ago

                Guess who drives the most in total.

                And guess how much it can be reduced with good public transport.

  • amino@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    13 hours ago

    i wonder if snipping off your car’s modem completely stops the flow of data. like sure, your car’s CPU is still gathering that data but they have no way to retrieve it. unless you visit a dealership or authorized mechanic shop?

    • quick_snail@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Ding ding. Airgaps get broken when you bring it to the dealer, they plug it in, and it downloads and uploads all your data.

      You gotta neuter the sensors

      • amino@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 hours ago

        maybe it’s different here in Europe, but why not avoid dealerships all-together? do you just not have third party mechanic shops?

        • quick_snail@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          What do you think the third party mechanic plugs into the car to read data from the computer?

      • phutatorius@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Under GDPR, in countries that have it, that could be challenged in court, forcing the insurers to show why the information collected is relevant to providing insurance.

      • bearboiblake@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 hours ago

        They don’t want you to know this, but members of the ruling class are human and therefore actually very easy to remove from power. You just take all of the goo out of them and that generally works.

    • dusty_raven@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Serious question, what is the best solution to this? My household has three cars, the newest is from 2008. It makes me nervous as to what to do if I wanted a “new” car (I’d never buy an actual new car, just new to me and made in the last ten years).

      • birdwing@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        53 minutes ago

        Remove the spyware junk. All you’d practically use (beside the driving essentials itself) is radio, heating, lighting, warning signs, aircon, and that’s it, really.* A Faraday cage can also help.

        * Not gonna lie, something in me wonders whether those also have spyware or not… but either way.

        • phutatorius@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 hours ago

          If the data is stored in the car, that just changes the timing of the privacy breach, not its existence.

    • Mac@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I do because I’m fuckin’ broke. But this is a nice benefit.