• FireRetardant@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    18 hours ago

    This kind of shit is what makes me not want an EV, that and I guess the ease of repair but that could change with proper regulation and resources. I’m all for EVs but my current relatively effecient ICE car doesn’t spy on me and that’s important as well.

      • FireRetardant@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Thats kinda my point. If my current car dies I’d like to replace it with an EV, but if even the ones used and 5 years old have this shit I’m not sure I’d want to compromise my privacy like that. My only options would likely be used plug in electric hybrids or early models of EVs that will likely need battery replacements/upgrades.

      • pomegranatefern@sh.itjust.worksOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        16 hours ago

        It sort of has something to do with EVs, in that it’s hard to find EVs made before this was standard, so if you’re looking for cars without it it’s hard to find one that doesn’t have an ICE engine.

        (Where cars aren’t avoidable, I do prefer they be electric, as, I’m sure, do many, but the privacy concerns are apparently very real.)

        • bearboiblake@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          57 minutes ago

          If it makes you feel better, EVs aren’t a real solution to the problems we face anyways, public transport was always the solution and EVs was a way to get consumers to keep focusing on individualism and consumerism to solve societal problems.

          Edit: So many replies falling over themselves about how EVs are a good “baby step”. They’re not. Hydrogen fuel cells is a good baby step. EVs are still extremely extractivist. Lithium batteries are very bad, environmentally speaking. Hydrogen is significantly cleaner. It is avoided because it would require unprofitable infrastructure to be rolled out to support hydrogen vehicles.

          • pomegranatefern@sh.itjust.worksOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 hour ago

            I am 100% in favor of density, non-car-centric urban development, active mobility and rock-solid public transit – I am on this community for a reason, after all, and I further do not drive. But I acknowledge that there are some cases where cars are important for trade work, hauling, etc., as well as where buses are the better option for transit, and in those cases I believe that the vehicle should be electrified. It may only be like 5% of the solution, but it’s a part of the solution nevertheless.

          • FireRetardant@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Rural places and bigots will still need or want personal cars. Some things like a trades work van or delivery service will still need a car/truck. These might as well be developed as electric. EVs are not the solution to our transportation and environmental issues but they are part of it.

          • phutatorius@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 hours ago

            EVs aren’t the perfect solution. But they’re less bad than ICE vehicles, and are a good interim measure unless/until public transport becomes more viable.

            Don’t let the best get in the way of the good enough for now. It’s OK to be in favor of two things.

          • hobovision@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 hours ago

            Cars will always be the best choice for many many trips for many many kinds of people. Cities are most efficient but not everyone can be in one, and public transit doesn’t work in farmland. We need both. EVs is a way to reduce the use of fossil fuels in transportation. We don’t have time to wait to densify every city and build out good transit networks, that will take decades. EVs have real benefits today. It just sucks modern cars are nightmares.

            • msage@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              7 hours ago

              Guess who drives the most in total.

              And guess how much it can be reduced with good public transport.