Privacy groups warn that flying plate readers could expand surveillance far beyond roadside cameras.

  • SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    6 hours ago

    AI bros who don’t take “no” for an answer are the same people as cops are the same people as rapists are the same people as republicans are the same people as pedophiles are the same people as bots pushers are the same people who fucking ruin everything

    It’s the “I know better than you” people

    • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Yup. They’re all over the perv-glasses threads telling people they have no right to privacy and it’s no different that a cell phone camera. meanwhile, they’re posting upskirts and downshirts, stalking videos, harassment, outright racist hate shit, all recorded with their cute lil fuckin perv-glasses.

      And meta keeps putting facial recognition shit in the APIs but denying it.

      the sad part is, they could be great tools for the disabled, but a bunch of shitkids have already ruined that use because meta wants profits more than helping people or -haha- letting people have privacy.

  • Kate-ay@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    6 hours ago

    A machine is being built, designed to stamp on a human face forever. We have to strangle it while it’s still in the cradle.

    • minorkeys@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Its been being built since forever. Its not a single moment but a relentless pressure by the few to exert complete control over everyone else. We’ve been convinced to spend none of our energy opposing it, so now it grows.

    • Widdershins@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 hours ago

      You can build a net gun to disable these without any of the 2A paperwork. All you need is PVC, net, a sprinkler valve, and a blow gun (the kind you use to release compressed air). If you can build a potato cannon you can build a net gun.

    • HCSOThrowaway@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Much harder and much more illegal to interfere with a drone; I’d be shocked if these needed replacing due to vandalism at all, let alone as frequently as people take out terrestrial Flock cameras.

      • solidheron@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Ahhhh, there’s ways to take out drones without anyone noticing. My favorite is a microwave Canon and the drone will fall out of the sky onto hard ground.

        • HCSOThrowaway@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Ahhhh, there’s ways to take out drones without anyone noticing. My favorite is a microwave Canon and the drone will fall out of the sky onto hard ground.

          Either you’re a super-genius that has worked out a cost-effective widely-adoptable anti-drone technology or technique that simply hasn’t occurred to Ukraine/Russia/USA/Iran/Oman/Saudi Arabia/etc…

          …or you’re just a person on the internet with an inflated ego.

          I know which one I think is more likely, especially given you weren’t able to differentiate between “Canon” and a “cannon.”

          • solidheron@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 hours ago

            Yeah I think drones used for war is different than a flock drone. Also Russia and Ukraine have destroyed drones in mass via jamming. Why drones have fiber optic cables now.

            I’m pretty sure drones get destroyed all the time it’s just that there’s a lot of fucking drones and I don’t think the militaries of the world are opposed to sending 50 drones to have 1 hit the target.

            Yeah you’re overestimating the amount of effort it would take to thwart 1 drone.

            Also I got more ideas microwave Canon is the most fun

            • HCSOThrowaway@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              5 hours ago

              Yeah I think drones used for war is different than a flock drone.

              For no apparent reason.

              Also Russia and Ukraine have destroyed drones in mass via jamming. Why drones have fiber optic cables now.

              And you think fiber optics are somehow impossible for law enforcement to deploy for what reason? Not to mention that has nothing to do with your Canon strategy, so goal-post moved successfully I guess.

              Also I got more ideas microwave Canon is the most fun

              I’m sure you have plenty of ideas. I’m less sure that most or any of them are worthwhile - at least as far as drone countermeasures go; if they were, you’d be far too busy making tons of money selling such equipment to the aforementioned countries.

              • greedytacothief@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                5 hours ago

                Actually I do think it would be difficult for cops to use fiberoptic cable for the stated reason of being a speed trap. Militaries don’t usually clean up after themselves, but having miles of fiberoptic along the expressway is probably dangerous and definitely littering. Not to mention they would have to be constantly purchasing more fiberoptic just to read license plates.

                Military use is expendable, domestic use needs to be reusable.

                • HCSOThrowaway@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  5 hours ago

                  I think you’re assuming the police would use the drones to kamikaze blow things up, leaving the fiber-optic behind.

              • solidheron@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                5 hours ago

                They need a reason to be different? Kinda getting desperate.

                Yeah I don’t see fiber optic being useful for flock cameras because well a car can run into the fiber optic cables and either pull it out of the drone or the operator using it. And it’s liability let’s say you they land on a power line and get fried or short the grid.

                Could you imagine winding up a fiber optic cable every time just you use a flock camera? Yeah your gonna use the wireless model.

                My ideas are probably already implemented. Either because I got them from someone else or I got them from an existing technology.

                If anything I’m importing the ideas from Russian war

                • HCSOThrowaway@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  5 hours ago

                  They need a reason to be different?

                  Yes, they need differences to be different. Sorry if that doesn’t make sense to you.

  • jpreston2005@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    1 day ago

    Pretty soon they’ll just have drones in the air monitoring large public events. Then smaller events. Most definitely any kind of protest.

    Technology is advancing faster than the ability of our aging, decrepit electorate to regulate it.

    • HCSOThrowaway@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Big thanks to all the leftists who stayed home because their local Democrat wasn’t left enough for them.

      • IAmYouButYouDontKnowYet@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        13 hours ago

        Like how nsa and the spying was real since Snowden leaks.

        …but it’s going to be worse.

        Sometimes I wonder if social media was specifically funded by the FEDs to datamine. They spent years manipulating people and collecting data, and now they are building data centers and applying software to profile people. It seems clear they will use hardware for policing on a new level, as well as move from the police force to ICE. These new drones and flock style ai monitoring is like the datamining of the real world.

        I think people are too engrossed in cultural consumer and entertainment escapism to even understand how fucked up things are. And it’s sad because that escapism is also feeding the datamining and marketing to further out people in hole soullessness and social manipulation. The path of our lives isn’t even our natural path anymore, they use our life for reasons that aren’t ours. Shit. That last sentence is a paraphrase from John Stockwell - a CIA whistle blower from the 80s.

        Death seems like it’s slowly becoming more genuine than life. Like it seems obvious the goal of those in control has nothing to do with genuine humanity, but instead some psychotic ideology based off fear of freedom and natural existence.

        If we’re lucky maybe someday they’ll allow us assisted suicide for the ailment of understanding truth. …but they’ll probably just crucify us, or genocide.

        • TrippingBalls@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 hours ago

          You’re 100%

          Look up the day Lifelog was retired by the gov and the day Facebook started… Do you believe in coincidences?

        • Nouvellalia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Your ancestors were made of sun and soil and dancing and joy and community and struggle. Those things still exist. You do not need to feed the algorithm.

      • HCSOThrowaway@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        7 hours ago

        You missed jpreston2005’s entire point, possibly intentionally for a chance to virtue signal.

          • HCSOThrowaway@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            6 hours ago

            Pedantically, yes, they should’ve mentioned drones have already been used.

            More to the point, the vast majority of their comment highlights the bar is getting lower and lower for what drones will be used for.

        • Some local cops got in trouble this year because they were using their drones as PHYSICAL enforcement of the drone-ban for the 4th of July fireworks.

          As in, they didn’t follow drones to find their owners, they tried to use their own drone to smash other ones out of the sky. They hit a car on the way down…

  • schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    63
    ·
    1 day ago

    Most depressing read of the week. RIP Bill of Rights.

    https://aerocorner.com/blog/legally-take-down-drone/

    Can I shoot down a drone?

    It is illegal to shoot a drone out of the sky, even when the drone is flying over private property.

    Is it legal to jam a drone?

    Jamming any type of radio signal is illegal.

    Can drones fly over houses?

    Drones can legally fly over houses in most areas.

    What should I do if I feel that a drone is invading my privacy?

    If you believe that a drone is infringing on your right to privacy, there are several options available. You can contact the owner of the drone and ask them to stop flying it in your vicinity, report it to local law enforcement or file a complaint with the FAA.

    • AItoothbrush@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      12 hours ago

      So its legal to shoot someone on your property if you have a sign about it on your fence but illegal to take down a drone? Feels like those priorities are pretty baclwards…

      • schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        11 hours ago

        It’s an extension of noble privilege, like Fox Hunting… Only rich people fly, so drones are as protected as rich people.

    • Murse@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      20 hours ago

      It is illegal to shoot a drone out of the sky

      Yeah well, it’s illegal to hold an insurrection against the US government, kidnap and imprison foreign country leaders, serially rape both adults and children, and defraud US elections, but it would seem being illegal doesn’t actually mean anything.

      • waterSticksToMyBalls@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 day ago

        You joke but it’s really your only option that isn’t a felony. There will be an faa investigation, but you won’t immediately cop a felony.

    • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 day ago

      Can I fly my own drone really close to a surveillance drone? You know, one that’s coincidentally full of expensive parts?

      Well… Yes. But why would you do such a thing?

      • this@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Automated drone that automatically fly in front of the flock drone’s camera to block its view, from the minimum safe/legal distance away. Multiple drones if that’s too far to have a decent effect.

      • FoxAlive@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Those 12 dollar ones are less than 100 grams and are using WiFi and would not really put a dent in that drone. Maybe you fan fly it at the props of the survalience drone, but I doubt you can even reach the altitude the survalience drones where meant to run on. Micro drones are actually the best to learn on because they’re so light its much harder to crash them. Once you are over 100-250 grams the force of the impact of a crash is much higher.

        You need a 5 inch frame, something that can use 4s, or 6s batteries that pull more amps. and you’re gonna want fpv if youre doing dog fights. A decent 5 inch frame you build yourself is around 400 with the camera, transmitter, flight controller, motors, props, battery, etc. The radio and fpv head set you can get for maybe 200, but you really want spend around 600 for those. Youre gonna be over the 250 gram flight limit before you gotta start doing legal shit, but fuck the FAA.

        That and most of the “real” drones that arent just some bullshit dji consumer friendly drone don’t fly easily. You get horizon, level, and acro. Acro is the mode you will actually use to fly, and you want at minimum a good 10-20 hours to be proficient enough to just hover/puts around without crashing. I’d say hitting another moving target is some where between 40-80 hours.

        • bonesawmcl@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          But a small 100g drone can carry quite a bit of high tensile strength string… Let’s see the big drone fly without it’s propellers.

  • Zephyr@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I remember years ago an engineer for the ARGUS-IS doing like a PSA warning about all of this. The missing piece then was a systems to sift through mountains of disparate data sources to pull together a single cohesive and relevant data point.

    • dan1101@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Which I’m guessing is why data centers are so hot right now. Surveillance state brought to us by big tech, billionaires, and corporations. They sell this stuff to naive or malicious police and government officials. I’m not too surprised the police are on board but so very many politicians are signing their localities up for it and citizens aren’t happy.

      • Zephyr@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 day ago

        We need something like deflock to keep track of who is signing off on all of this so people can organize and vote them out. It’s a very bipartisan issue.

  • SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    1 day ago

    “Citizen, our drone spotted you smoking marijuana in your bedroom. Do you have a prescription? Let’s figure this out downtown.”

    • Crozekiel@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 day ago

      Parasols. Umbrellas stop rain, so it’s sus1 to use one when it isn’t raining. Parasols are for sunny days.

      1 - Being sus might as well be a crime in the US at this point.