• psx_crab@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Chinese citizen would be living under

    Correction: Chinese citizens already living under a surveillance state. UK and now US and also many other countries is merely learning from the best(worst). Mandatory age verification for socmed and game? China already have that years ago. ISP level blocking? Great Firewall of China is there from the beginning.

    • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      14 minutes ago

      End to end encryption chats are banned in China btw. China is living in this complete dystopia already and the only reason we don’t hear it because China is very good at hiding this. The great firewall is as much to contain Chinese inside as it is to repel others.

  • Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    The surveillance state is not just in the US. China and the UK love that shit too. Pretty much any government with the money and will for it is doing it for the benefit of a digital panopticon.

    • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12 minutes ago

      Funny how this surveillance never correlates with any happiness or safety metrics. It’s almost like it’s not there to improve society but to control it or something 🤔

  • Kurtismayfield@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    For decades people have been warming about inverted totalitarianism… where private companies do the heavy lifting in controlling and surveillance or the population. Very few listened. Now that we are approaching complete sacrifice of your privacy to these companies, people are finally waking up. But it may be too late.

    • IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      71
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      14 hours ago

      This isn’t a capitalism problem. It’s an authoritarianism problem. The only thing about this that relates to capitalism is that it’s a private company setting up the cameras instead of the state doing it.

      • Canaconda@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        38
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        14 hours ago

        That’s a gross over simplification that ignores the influence of the insurance industry shifting the baseline of public surveillance and crony capitalism that infects our municipalities.

        • chaogomu@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          13 hours ago

          Yes, that’s how it’s implemented under capitalism.

          States further into their authoritarianism don’t need to bother with middle men and cutouts and shit.

          They just put up the cameras.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        14 hours ago

        “Decentralize the mass surveillance!” cries the anarcho-libertarian. “Big Government is monopolizing all the cameras! We should let the market decide who gets spied on!”

      • hayvan@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        14 hours ago

        This is absolutely a capitalism problem. It’s what happens when you let corporations do whatever without consequences as long as they can afford the bribes and in turn get contacts on taxpayer money.

        • OwOarchist@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          13 hours ago

          True, but I could also see an authoritarian “communist” government doing all the same surveillance bullshit.

          So, while it’s a capitalism problem this time, I don’t think it’s a capitalism-exclusive problem. It really is, at its root, an authoritarianism problem. This time, you’ve got capitalist authoritarianism, but next time maybe a different flavor.

          • Talcosis@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            9 hours ago

            You can’t get rid of authoritarianism the same way you can’t get rid of stupid. Some portion of the population will always be the bottom of the bell curve.

            What you can do, however, is redirect it into something positive. For example, Japanese social structures are pretty fuckin’ authoritarian. Most people wouldn’t even dream of littering.

            • OwOarchist@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 hours ago

              You can’t get rid of authoritarianism the same way you can’t get rid of stupid.

              True, but you can get rid of hierarchical authority itself, leaving the authoritarians nothing to work with. Ask your local anarchist how.

      • distal@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Authoritarianism means very little, it’s such a broad term that doesn’t localise the origin of repression. Instead of considering the root of the problem here, which is capitalism/private property, you look at a feature or a phenomenon.

        • Talcosis@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Meh, there’s some smart people that have come up with a pretty clear understanding of authoritarianism.

          https://theauthoritarians.org/

          But your conclusion is also partly correct, the authoritarian personality is not inherently bad, they must first be weaponized.

          • distal@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 hours ago

            I didn’t say anything about the authoritarian personality and I don’t really care that some people have figured out something they view as being integral to comprehending society. Honestly, I find life under the systems people like Fromm consider least authoritarian, think Sweden in the 70s, to still be be very brutal towards the masses.

            But you know what, I believe your conclusion is also party correct. People with an “authoritarian” streak can be used to guard a worker’s movement.

    • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      13 hours ago

      The same thing is happening/has already happened in China, the government there can find you and black bag you anywhere at any time. Ask Naomi Wu.

      Russia basically is this already.

      Europe is also trying to go there with the repeated attempts to pass chat control and age restrictions on internet access.

      In the US, capitalism is the tool the authoritarians are using to accomplish their goals, and it is absolutely enabling the spread of the surveillance state. Capitalism itself is not the motivation for the surveillance state, it’s just being used by the authoritarians. If we’re going to put a stop to this kind of behavior, we have to get the targets right. Flock and the other companies like them are a symptom of the larger problem.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Ask Naomi Wu.

        To my knowledge, Naomi Wu was never “black bagged”. She’s still selling stuff on cybernightmarket. She’s just done posting politics.

        But to compare the grief Wu got (and, from what I read forever ago, it was as much other terminally online types screaming at her as any state intervention) with Leqaa Kordia or Mahmoud Khalil both of whom absolutely were “black bagged” in the literal sense? Wu was not indefinitely detained in a prison camp or threatened with torture unless she “voluntarily self-deported”, at least as far as I could find.

        Russia basically is this already.

        Russia is so much more, as they’ve weaponized their prison population into military conscripts.

        Really not looking forward to the day I’m arrested by an ICE agent who is, himself, wearing a bomb collar.

        Capitalism itself is not the motivation for the surveillance state

        The surveillance state is a vital tool of private industry when executives fear a proletariat insurrection. It is a necessary precondition to prevent insurrection.

        • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 minutes ago

          Russia is so much more, as they’ve weaponized their prison population into military conscripts.

          It’s even more than that. Russia has weaponized their entire civilian population. It’s straight up nazi-level shit where you’re either Z or you’re a traitor. This is what American maga salivates about - complete and utter obedience through surveillance, legal and cultural bullying.

        • syaochan@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          25 minutes ago

          To my knowledge, Naomi Wu was never “black bagged”. She’s still selling stuff on cybernightmarket. She’s just done posting politics.

          She disappeared from western social media, where she was very active before. Her latest post on twitter was chilling, I just hope she and her partner are ok.

        • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          …including, like, the custodian?

          You’re not going to win over undecided people by advocating for unreasonable, indiscriminate violence, you’re just going to give the opposition ammunition for calling you an extremist.

          It would be far more productive to support groups like the EFF and ACLU in lobbying for legislation to prevent such abusive technology. Also get involved in your local town/county politics to advocate against the installation of such things. The absolute last thing the sick fuckers running companies like Flock want is for people to organize against them. Don’t push people away, encourage them to join.

          • PRIMEcavitationfetishist@quokk.au
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 hours ago

            Sorry I’m not interested in your equivocating bullshit.

            Who’s still undecided on clock? Who doesn’t burn with hare for anyone who’d install one of these? Fucking your Nazi coddling bullshit. Guilty is guilty.

            lobbying for legislation to stop

            The thing the local government in question already told them to stop. They will continue or they will be killed. Or I guess like a carrington event or something, but barring that they will continue or they will be kille

            Cut it with your divisive fetishism of systems that have already proven useless for keeping us sage, and caused the problem in the first place. Pick a side.

            • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 hours ago

              Cut it with your divisive fetishism

              Pick a side.

              Right… I’m the one being divisive, by saying that we should organize and work together. Hilarious.

              systems that have already proven useless

              The thing doing the most damage to Flock right now is the negative public opinion pushing counties and townships to cancel contracts. Those “useless” systems are actively responding to the demands of their citizens, and Flock cameras are being removed in many jurisdictions. The way you hurt a capitalist enterprise is to take away its money (loss of contracts).

              So, how about you “pick a side” and join in with the effort that is actually producing results?

              https://www.npr.org/2026/02/17/nx-s1-5612825/flock-contracts-canceled-immigration-survillance-concerns

              https://www.politico.com/news/2026/08/09/flock-cameras-backlash-cancellations-01026242

              https://banflockcameras.com/tracker/

              Take Action

              We don’t have to accept this future. You can:

              Stay informed about local meetings: ALPR.watch provides a calendar and map of upcoming public meetings with agenda items related to Flock and other surveillance systems. You can sign up for email alerts when meetings near you are scheduled.
              Contact your local officials and demand transparency and oversight of surveillance programs. (See 5 Calls)
              Support organizations like the ACLU and the EFF who challenge mass surveillance in the courts and legislatures.
              Start conversations with neighbors and community groups about the risks of systems like Flock.
              Share this website and make your community aware.

              https://www.stopflock.com/

  • Jason2357@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Always thought it was weird that they would scoff at their “social credit score” system. Emphasis on “social”. As if that was the fucked up part.

    • stumu415@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 hours ago

      It amazes me that the western propaganda keeps talking about a Chinese social credit system that is an extension of existing social rankings and ratings in China which have existed for millennia, but no one blinks an eye to this American credit system that is horrendous. The Chinese system is mainly in place for business, not so much the individual, like in the US.

      The US credit system is a way to make the poor, poorer with insane interest rates that are illegal in other parts of the world. The matrix for the credit system is unclear as it is managed by private companies. The whole thing is insane, but no let’s point at evil China where the system has no impact on normal people, unlike in the US.

      • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 minutes ago

        except china ALSO has a credit system, exactly the same one we do in the west but with a nice topping of authoritarian dystopian government inputs. yay!

      • Leet@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        17 minutes ago

        I don’t think China really has a social credit score do they? It was an abandoned pilot

  • Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    9 hours ago

    The problem is that state agents can use surveillance tech or surveillance services with no regulatory review on how this technology interacts with the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States, what is specifically supposed to protect Americans from this sort of stuff.

    This is partly due to the presumption of regularity, the assumption by courts that law enforcement follows rules, even when we know they historically do not. (And DHS is even worse).

    It’s a separate problem that private companies can also buy this data. They shouldn’t have the right to surveil Americans for private purposes any more than the state does.

    Also be aware that some districts that are ending their contracts with Flock Safety are quietly switching over to other ALPR services such as Axon. Don’t let your district get away with it.

  • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 hours ago

    There is somewhere between 60% and 90% of Americans who think at least one party in government, or Israel rulership that, hates them. In China, that is well under 10%. Both are extreme surveillance states. In China, you can plug a charger for your ebike on the street, and no one will steal it. Its used for genuine property protection instead of CIA Man persecution.

    So the “Chinese were living under” line misses the point of what surveillance is used for. US decline needs desperate regime oppression to perpetuate itself from the threat of the people it hates, but who may/have the democratic power to escape the clockwork orange propaganda feed.

    • thebestaquaman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      And no one will steal it

      Too bad someone will steal you before you can get back to the bike if you have the wrong political sticker on the bike :/

    • Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      9 hours ago

      The other day, I saw the first Waymo van in Sacramento.

      If I saw the Waymo van, then it saw me, and Waymo infamously shares all its scanning data with law enforcement.

      I wasn’t doing anything illegal, but that doesn’t really matter in the states. Crime here is not about what you did, but who you are. And it’s becoming also about what you think.

      • xSikes@feddit.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Yellow cab doesn’t have dash cam last time I was in one in MYC a couple years ago.

        • titanicx@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Some do. That’s an idiotic take of why a taxi over an Uber. You don’t think that if Uber didn’t exist that cabs wouldn’t add cameras? Just Google the number of companies that have already added cameras to them.

    • Carmakazi@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      13 hours ago

      As the future becomes less certain and less secure due to climate change and capitalist overextension, basically every major government is looking for ways to efficiently control their populace through technology. Arguably the countries with the strongest totalitarian tools would be the most suited to weather that long-term catastrophe.

      Can’t riot about access to food if everyone who so much as says an idle word in their own home is put on a “reeducation” pathway.

      • Zirconium@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Palestine is the testing grounds for surveillance, drones, weaponry, and testing how public opinion will be around a crisis & genocide. Now they’re planning to test it upon their own citizens once they finish moving/genociding immigrants.

    • Imhotep@feddit.fr
      link
      fedilink
      Français
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      13 hours ago

      China has been proposing its surveillance model to other countries through their new silk roads (or whatever the name is)

    • distal@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Not a China fan, but at least I can travel to China without getting arrested.

      • chaogomu@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        11 hours ago

        That’s only true if you only do and say things online that China approves of.

        China has secret police, and has for decades.

        ICE is Trump’s attempt at creating a secret police.

        • distal@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Look, I said that I can travel to China without getting arrested. That is a fact. I can’t say the same about the USA. If they knew I was coming to the states they would also know what I’ve posted and liked with 90% certainty, and believe me, they don’t want someone who’s been this deep into “anti-capitalism” as me entering the country. The United States government has more than enough reasons to go full stick instead of carrot when we consider its failing economy and the rebirth of social movements.

          I know what I can expect in China, I know that they won’t arrest someone because they once posted a picture of a yellow umbrella or liked a John Oliver video. That is too much of a hassle and China is currently liberalising, just like Kuwait and Qatar. Plans about opening the great firewall up have been floated again and again, and authorities are seriously considering doing that.

          Plus you’re are completely, and I hope I don’t sound too much like a stereotypical ML – which I am not despite being on lemmy.ml – ignoring the CIA and DHS. Two, as it were, secret federal agencies with powers that go well beyond what the FBI or ATF can do. These have existed for decades. States simply have secret polices.

          • chaogomu@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 hours ago

            I’m one of the people who always says that Lenin was a fucking monster, and that no authoritarian can ever be communist. Which includes China.

            I’m 100% sure that if I ever found myself going to China, I’d be arrested for calling Xi a fascist poo bear playing pretend at communism.

            I’m also quite certain that come November Trump will start working up to arresting people for things said online. I’m sure I’ll be at risk for calling him a pedo and posting this link; https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2016/10/6/1578544/-The-Untold-Story-of-Trump-Model-Management-A-Daily-Kos-Exclusive-Part-1

            • djsiete@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              4 hours ago

              Please stop this narrative. Western Marxists/communists and their purity posturing is exhausting. Say what you will of the CPC but it is a party that has taken China from backwater country to world leader within 60-70 years. Do you want China to instead be “democratic” the way the US is?

          • chaogomu@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 hours ago

            Nope. Proud Boys are the brown shirts. Non-governmental paramilitary fighters.

            FBI was an actual law enforcement organization, but has been gutted.

            The CIA isn’t a boogie man inside the US. They’ve fucked up enough times that very few people respect them. Also they don’t really do domestic spying.

            No, the NSA is the one who does domestic spying.

            And finally ICE, an agency that is 100% filled with diehard Trump supporters. They’re already abducting innocent people off the street and vanishing them. Masked thugs working for the state vanishing people without warrants is sort of the basic definition of secret police.

          • chaogomu@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 hours ago

            Didn’t forget them, they’re not sending masked thugs to vanish people from the street.

            The NSA is a spy org, but not full of Trump loyalists.

            Trump is focusing on ICE, because it is full of specifically Trump loyalists.