An unprecedented surge in Black voter turnout across the American South is fundamentally reshaping the 2026 midterm political landscape. This massive, highly localized mobilization is defying traditional non-presidential voting patterns and threatening to turn what was expected to be a standard midterm election cycle into a “Blue Tsunami” for Democrats, breaking open what were previously considered safe Republican strongholds.

…

  • likebudda@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    18 minutes ago

    On recent podcasts, Nate Silver said his models had a 75% probability of the Dems winning both the house and senate, and then said his models had Hillary at a 75% probability too. He was all “as a poker player, I understand how big of a difference 75% and 100% is.”

  • ButtermilkBiscuit@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Meh, whatever drives it we need to expand the supreme court asap then get cases on the docket that can restore voting rights act provisions, rowe provisions, Chevron doctrine, and on and on. Fuck the heritage foundation scum Nazis.

  • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 hours ago

    So…the only reason why black Americans are constantly shit on is because they dont want to vote?

  • OwOarchist@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    61
    ·
    17 hours ago

    It’s also all the fucking gerrymandering – the harder you gerrymander, the thinner your margins get in the ‘winning’ districts.

    • booly@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Yup. Mathematically, gerrymandering is a combination of packing (putting as many as you can of the opposing side into a concentrated district you lose) and cracking (spreading the opposing side among the remaining districts so that they can’t get a majority of any of them).

      If you try to grab too many seats, though, your gerrymandering advantage is diluted in any given district so that you may actually lose a lot in a wave year, more than if you even didn’t gerrymander.

      So imagine a state that has 10 districts of 100 usual voters each, 500 of each party. Most years, each party gets 5 out of the 10 seats. But if you’re gerrymandering, you can pack 2 districts 90/10 and build a 60-40 advantage in the other 8, which holds your 8-2 advantage unless the population swings 20 points. Or you can get greedy and try to pack one district 90/10 and build only a 55-45 advantage in the other 9, good for most years but vulnerable to a swing of 10%. At that point, you might have accidentally given the other side a 10-seat sweep in a year where the popular vote goes 560-440, with one district going 99-1 and the other 9 going 52-48 or so.

      Most real world gerrymandering isn’t that clean, but the intended goal was to create a bunch of 55-45 districts. And now those districts might actually swing.

      • OwOarchist@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        good for most years but vulnerable to a swing of 10%

        From what I’ve heard, a lot of red states have been very greedy lately – going to 5% or even 2.5% margins in winning districts. And I think 2026 is going to show them what a bad idea that was.

    • Obviouslywrong@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Specifically if there is a higher than expected turnout or swing you can overflow and lose more seats than if you haven’t gerrymandered.

  • disorderly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    154
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    20 hours ago

    I don’t care about anyone’s vote but yours, Internet stranger. Fuck the news, make sure you’re counted.

        • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          18
          ·
          19 hours ago

          Mindlessly repeating “just vote” isn’t going to change anyone’s minds

          Which doesn’t really matter here, because I highly doubt anyone on political forums isn’t voting.

          But that just makes it even more pointless. Not just pointless, your brain gives a little dopamine release like you did something, which makes you less likely to do something effective.

          Like, I fully get the spirit, everyone should vote.

          But you’re working against your own interests bud.

          • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            16 hours ago

            Can’t hurt to remind people to vote. I think if we understood voting habits we could’ve never been surprised trump won at any point. Yet most people were.

    • altphoto@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 hours ago

      He is bubbah the Trump penis locator. And since he plays the sax, he can blow. LOL. Let’s get out there and vote!! I voted by mail already. Now see how they planned things…voting by mail is nice and cozy. You get as much time to research and read at your kitchen table or living room couch. Now let’s see you go out there and vote…suddenly miserable weather, Colorado for example has floods right now but they still need to vote. Here, its freezing 39C outside right now. Nice move, but you had options. Now go vote in freezing weather. And oh take PTO. We’re not making this a holiday or having it on a Saturday or Sunday. The point is to prevent you from voting. So vote!!!

        • altphoto@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          I love Bill Clinton. He was awesome. If official WH bj masters were a thing, I’d support that. If it was our first woman president and she needed some stress relief, why not.

          But the old mental pile of sunscreen, that guy is a pedo and everyone knows it. He’s gotta go.

          • 777Prawn@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 hour ago

            Clinton appeared on Epstein’s private jet at least 16 times between 2002 and 2003.

            Enough not to use him anymore.

            • rumba@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              58 minutes ago

              Unless he’s saying, yeah, I saw him down there… He was doing that…

                • rumba@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  45 minutes ago

                  Clinton is a horrible person, but he likely has a lot of dirt that the right will have a harder time to ignore. Saying you saw what you saw is stronger than giving the right documents to read.

  • James R Kirk@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Georgia is expected to go blue for the senate and Louisiana, Mississippi and South Carolina are all within 10pts. The only only southern states are Florida, Tenessee and Arkansas.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Georgia is expected to go blue for the senate

      I’m really annoyed that the governor’s race doesn’t seem like it’s in play, since nobody seems to be talking about it.

      Wish we had a better candidate than KLB.

        • grue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          14 hours ago

          I’m glad to hear it, but I’m still worried. Admittedly, I insulate myself from advertising pretty well, but I haven’t heard nearly enough negative about the fascist billionaire candidate. Aside from how it would make it even worse if he won, I almost wish he were a more obvious villain like Greg Abbott or Ron DeSantis.

          (Not to mention, as an Atlantan who’s been disappointed with her for a decade, there aren’t nearly as many reasons to vote for Bottoms, as opposed to against Jackson, as I’d like. Still held my nose and early-voted for her, but I can think of half a dozen candidates I would’ve preferred even just drawing from Atlanta city councilpeople.)