• Brkdncr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    I think it’s doing on-device summarization. No transcript is retained or sent off.

    • kingofras@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      This is the correct comment. But the one with the assumption is voted higher. Lemmy loving vibes more than facts, day 1,436.

      Yes, the audio is never stored, the summaries can be completely turned off, and yes, Apple again is caught inside its own bubble being ever more disconnected from the outside silicon valley life. They should not have touted this so strongly and loudly.

      People will these devices are being kidnapped daily and forced to open their devices. Even without the audio some of these transcripts can be used as evidence against them or their families, violating their 5th amendment rights.

      • Rothe@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        You don’t have the facts either though. You are just assuming whatever Apple says is the truth.

        • kingofras@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          Apple says stuff about Apple product. How is that not a fact?

          They said that. They have very little incentive to lie.

          • derAbsender@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            1 day ago

            They have the only incentive that matters to lie: Profit.

            If they would admit that the Data is send to Servers and or saved, there would be backlash hurting their bottom line.

            And they should record and save everything to collect and sell the Data, aiding their bottom line.

            • kingofras@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 day ago

              Man, I don’t know. Where I’m coming ‘Profit’ is the exact reason not to do this.

              You’re applying redneck town butcher level of business logic to the most successful corporation on the planet, constantly being probed by hackers.

              They are so married to this privacy stance that even the hint of that coming out would decimate their userbase.

              • derAbsender@piefed.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                1 day ago

                Most normal Data collection is already ignored

                Either willfully because it got normalized or not really willfully since “they wouldnt do it because what if it came Out?”

                Well… They do it. It is known. But since Apple always was pretty culty the members dont really care and everyone that cares doesnt use Apple, because they know they steal Data and dont believe the pinky promise they wouldnt sell it.

                • kingofras@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  Look, I like that you’re a crititical thinker. Now read the disclaimer at the bottom:

                  Privacy Exposure ratings and summaries are AI-generated assessments based on publicly available privacy policies

                  That’s right, you quoted slop to a cult member!

                  Health data is not stored, are you mad. That would violate every country’s privacy law other than the USA and China.