• worhui@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    So Sony is now the new RCA. This is a new low for the company. I can’t believe that they are gone just like that.

    • entropicdrift@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Well, their TV brand is gone. Their headphones are still the top tier of consumer stuff and price-performance king for studio headphones

  • TheReanuKeeves@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    I had a TCL phone for a bit about 10 years ago and it was the hottest piece of garbage I had ever touched in my life

  • J52@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    The only negative thing about my TCL tv is that it’s running Google tv launcher. I replaced that with Projectivy.

  • mrnobody@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Makes sense, bc idk anybody with a Sony TV anymore. Even loyalist fans friends of mine from the CRT days switched.

    • darcmage@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I own a sony TV. The hdtvtest guy is my goto for staying updated on TV tech and sony regularly comes out as his best of the year. Yes, they’re pricey but you’re getting something for that premium.

      This is a sad day in my books now that TCL will be able to enshittify the Sony brand.

        • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Their early “4k/120s” weren’t even actually 4k/120. Enabling 120hz refresh rates on early Bravias would cut horizontal resolution in half, and then crudely attempt to upscale it.

          • plantfanatic@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            I mean the true 120hz, not the upscaled crap.

            They came out the same time hdmi got the bandwidth capacity, so before that, it wasn’t even possible.

            I partly use Rtings.com for my info, and they test everything.

            • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              No I know what you mean. I’m not talking about the “Trumotion” 120hz motion smoothing technology.

              The first generation of Sony Bravia TVs that advertised native 4k/120hz, specifically to coincide with the release of the PS5, couldn’t actually do native 4k/120hz. It wasn’t until their following generations that were finally able to, in a post-launch firmware update.

              • plantfanatic@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 month ago

                Then you’re misremembering a lot of stuff

                https://www.rtings.com/tv/reviews/sony/x900h

                This tv came out around the same time as the ps5 (Nov of 2020). A few features came in a later update, but it is 4k/120 out of the box. You couldn’t get a better tv at the time.

                The 800 was never advertised as 120, this is the first model.

  • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Sony’s modern OLEDs are sick. There are a few between my family, and they have the best processing I’ve seen, they decode massive bluray rips no problem, and native options for a clean ad-free UI.

    Why TF aren’t people buying them?

    • dmtalon@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      For me, for my use case it’s primarily because of the size TV I want. Mine is going in the basement on a wall where I want the biggest TV I can afford. That means I could get an 83" screen in OLED or a 98-100" QLED. 15" difference is pretty dramatic.

      • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Oh man, you’re missing out on OLED in a basement though. It’s so fantastic for dimly lit evironments that I’d take the smaller size any day, and just sit a little closer. LCDs, on the other hand, look pretty terrible in a really dark room.

        The only thing that would make me pause is if you’re trying to squeeze a big family around the TV. In that case, it would make sense to get a bigger one, so everyone can sit farther back without compromised viewing angles.

        • REDACTED@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          It’s the main purpose of them, yes. Define TV to me. I don’t see the point of paying for decoders, smart TV and bunch of other things I’ll never use, much smarter decision is to buy a monitor which focuses on image quality and performance, far more suitable for consoles, Roku, etc.

          Commenter above low-key described that OLED as a monitor more than a TV

          • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            TVs are fantastic monitors.

            It sounds reasonable to not want to pay for basically a small computer inside the TV.

            But in practice, its not that expensive of a component. And TV volumes are so high that they’re bigger and cheaper and higher quality than an equivalently priced monitor, anyway.

            Hence, while I’m fine with the monitors I have, I’m never buying a “monitor” again. It just makes no financial sense when I can get a 40" 4K TV with 120hz VRR instead, that happens to work fantastically as a streaming box too.

            • REDACTED@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              My experience is that they all look terrible up close, for whatever reason. TVs are essentially designed for further-back viewing