The progressive group Indivisible called for Democratic lawmakers on Wednesday to replace Sen. Chuck Schumer (N.Y.) as Democratic leader after the party secured control of both chambers of Congress in Tuesday’s midterm elections.

“Yesterday, voters made it very clear that they want a new generation of Democratic fighters,” the group wrote in a social media post. “We need a leader in the Senate who is capable of leading that fight. It’s time for Senate Democrats to choose new leadership.”

The group cited the Democratic leader’s faltering approval ratings in its Wednesday statement. An NBC News poll conducted at the end of October found only 13 percent of registered voters viewed Schumer’s leadership positively.

“The American people did not elect Democrats by historic margins just to bend the knee and go back to business as usual,” Indivisible said in its statement. “Senate Democrats need to listen to the voters and turn the page on status quo politics.”

The paid opposition running the Democrats will not falter in their supporting of their Republican donors’ causes.

  • Kirp123@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    1 hour ago

    Both Schumer and Jeffries need to go. Jeffries went on TV not long ago and said he doesn’t support dismantling ICE or passing Medicare for All.

  • schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    55 minutes ago

    The reality: Democrats lost to Trump in 2012 and 2024.

    What Schumer and Jeffries explicitly say they want: To go back to the way things were in 2024 (roll back all of Trump’s policies).

    Likely result of doing so: Democrats continue to lose to Republicans.

    Obvious conclusion: Democrats need to push an actual policy that gives people am economic reason to vote for them and makes the donor class uncomfortable. “A Return to Normalcy” is a losing strategy.

    Trump’s incompetence has granted us a reprieve, but the next fascist we elect may be younger, smarter, more capable. We can not fuck this up.

  • MountingSuspicion@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 hour ago

    If they mess up coming out of this midterm win, I will be astounded if they are able to take the presidency. Dems will never have another chance like this to really demonstrate a new vision. I hope they don’t fumble it.

    • hemmes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 minutes ago

      Honestly, it’s still up to us. It’s us, as constituents, that won the midterms.

      We need to demonstrate the new vision. Our congressmen are there to represent what we want, they’re not there to come up with stuff we may want to see happen.

      That means you have to write them and tell them exactly what you want to see. It’s not just about winning a vote, make sure they hear what you have to say.

  • 2piradians@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 hour ago

    The status quo is Schumer’s specialty, he couldn’t change even if he wanted to. Far from leading the Senate he should be warming the your ass is next to go in '28 bench.

  • DagwoodIII@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 hour ago

    Which option is more likely to get a Dem elected President in 2028?

    A - A long, drawn out impeachment fight that leaves JD as President?

    B- Hitting the ground fast and getting Medicare For All passed and signed by Trump?

    I want a deal making arm-twister who can get things done. I want LBJ in charge of the Senate.

    • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      21 minutes ago

      I think the issue with this plan is that most elected Dems don’t support Medicare For All. DSA needs to primary and replace them first. It’s doable but will take time. Something more realistic is needed for the next two years.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      30 minutes ago

      Save the jail talk for people who acted I Legally. For the corrupt, not just those whose policies we dislike