A nearby school has just finished construction and is planning to open next week. However, it’s already been struck multiple times by bullets escaping a shooting range a mile or so away. They’ve released notices telling people to avoid one side of the building due to the stray bullets and adjusted activities to the late evening when the range is closed.

After asking the range to improve it’s quality so that this doesn’t happen, the shooting range apparently told them to pound sand. Now there’s a big lawsuit trying to force this shooting range to actually stop the bullets being fired so they don’t kill children because they refuse to do anything.

Source added

  • schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    That’s pretty fucked up. I’ve been to a shooting range in my state and it I think they designed it so it’s impossible for bullets to escape. I mean, maybe if you wanted to shoot through the roof you could manage it.

    • PattyMcB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Outdoor range. Berm stop. Sounds like they just need to raise the berm height and kick morons off the range who shoot too high.

      • Madison420@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        17 minutes ago

        More put an upper stop on outdoor ranges as well stop high shots don’t matter. The Swiss have a range that’s designed so safe they’re approved to shoot across and above an active highway.

        If it were a noise complaint I’m with the range because they existed before the school. That said if it’s hitting the school it means your range is profoundly unsafe that shit wouldn’t fly at a residential range let alone a commercial one and at that point I’m with the school even if it was dumb to choose a spot across from a gunrange.

      • Jax@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Kinda hard to prove if someone shoots high unless they do it constantly. I think the better option is the range paying for a physical barrier, essentially creating a berm in between the school and the range but much much closer to the school.

        • AHemlocksLie@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          19 minutes ago

          Nah, fuck that, the bullets need to come to a full stop inside the shooting range. You wanna run a business on giving people a place to shoot? It’s your responsibility to make sure nobody outside the range is getting shot.

  • Keilik@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I really have a hard time believing this even just from a ballistics standpoint, bullets are not lasers and from a mile (ish) away there is absolutely no way they could be hitting unless they were aiming specifically for it. Bullets travel in a massive parabola so the shooter would need to be aiming so far above any kind of target that this is incredibly unlikely

      • Zulu@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 hours ago

        It isnt within a mile of the school if you look it up on the map.

        Instead how about not within a 1mile range AND nothing should be downrange of one for well over 10miles unless properly blocked by a catch wall, or massive mount of dirt or something.

    • PattyMcB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      6 hours ago

      It’s likely that the trajectory is common for bullets that just barely go over the berm. It sounds like an incredible coincidence of math.

      • Fishnoodle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Yeah, shots hitting the berm just right can deflect like that, and there’s also situations where bullets can ricochet or get deflected during normal shooting in a manner that could cause them to travel that far.

        If it’s happening with any regularity though, I would say there’s either a design issue with the range, or the people there are assholes

        • PattyMcB@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 hours ago

          I would hazard a guess that yes, the range needs to raise the berm height and ban shooters who regularly shoot over it.

      • Keilik@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 hours ago

        The .338 Lapua is a round designed for long distance shooting and at a mile its bullet drop is 32 yards or 96 feet. That’s almost like a raindrop in a windstorm, and it means you’d have to aim so absurdly high over a target it would be intentional. There is no just slipping over the berm, unless the berm is within a few hundred feet of the school.

        • PattyMcB@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 hours ago

          What about 9mm (most common)?

          And lots of shooters are TERRIBLE.

          And with FRTs becoming more common, bad shooters are becoming even worse shots. (The rapid firing walks the impact of successive shots higher)

          • gnate@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 minutes ago

            I wouldn’t be concerned about a handgun cartridge vs. a long range sniper cartridge with roughly 10x the muzzle energy.

          • AHemlocksLie@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            16 minutes ago

            I want to say smaller bullets tend to suffer more from drag and so can’t go as far. It’s not that drag is heavier, but that it’s heavier in proportion to the mass of the bullet.

    • yesman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Gun owners are, by definition, myopic and irresponsible. They like to do pranks, like celebratory gunfire. This kind of gunfire kills people all the time. You’re more likely to die catching a bullet this way, than people who get shot on purpose. That’s because the bullet moving downward is likely to strike the head, shoulders, or (if you’re lucky) feet.

      Bullets like this are fatal even if fired miles away and slowed to terminal velocity. The average gun owner may not realize that bullets are purposefully designed to move through air quite efficiently and do damage to anything they strike.

      Stray bullets fired from long distances are absolutely fatal.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Celebratory_gunfire