• Fizz@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Yes thats how they generate revenue. Its done on search terms instead of knowing the customers ad profile like google.

    • YoSoySnekBoi@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Only if you enable them iirc. uBlock ensures they’re always off so I can’t say I’ve checked in a while

  • [object Object]@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    19 hours ago

    DDG gets their results from corporate indexes.

    Edit: wow, there’s a lot of porn and The Wall Street Journal on there

    • YoSoySnekBoi@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Everyone gets their results from corporate indexes. If they didn’t they’d be fucked, b/c most sites disallow scrapers that aren’t Google/Bing/Yahoo/etc.

    • Steve@communick.news
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      Kagi gets their results from corporate indexes.
      They check all the indexes everywhere more or less.

      Kagi’s real difference is in not being an ad platform, like DDG and nearly every other search provider is.

      • GunnarKris@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 hours ago

        While DDG does show “ads” by default. They can be turned off in settings. DDG does still give the user the power of how they want to use/support them.

        All of the AI features can be turned off as well or by using noai.duckduckgo.com

    • CerebralHawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      20 hours ago

      It’s actually an ad and marked as such.

      But let’s unpack this bullshit right here. Everything is going up. Someone wants to download something for free because they’re getting squeezed on all sides. So let’s not only charge them for content that’s already been paid for and made all its costs back, we’ll bump up the price every year or so, and use that money to advertise our rising price service to people who are struggling to make ends meet rather than just lowering the price.

      That’s without even getting into who owns Paramount and what their politics are.

      • schipelblorp@sh.itjust.worksOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        19 hours ago

        My problem with streaming services is that shows you are actively watching can disappear at any time.

        Watching a show on Netflix? Oops, it’s on Disney+ now. Watching a show on Disney+? Oops, it’s on another service owned by Disney, but sign up now for a discounted bundle! Watching a show on HBO that was produced by HBO and owned by HBO? Oops, HBO got bought by an MBA that thinks they can make more money selling the streaming rights to Netflix, or worse, just save a few pennies on royalties but not making the show available at all.

        I’d say, “ok, i have one or two streaming services at a time and i’ll just limit myself to what’s available; I want to support the system” and the system would find a way to fuck me every single time.

        • CerebralHawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Right. I still pay for streaming music because music is still generally all available on each service. If you pay for Apple Music or Spotify, you pretty much get everything. Exceptions generally happen across all services, and they’re rare. Country artist Garth Brooks, great example. He was briefly on Amazon Music for a minute, but AFAIK isn’t on any streaming service. Most stuff most of us like, if it’s on one of the big music streamers, it’s on all of them. I still prefer to acquire FLACs of what I really like. I have most of my favourites on my Plex server. I also have them on my desktop PC. And I have them on an old Android phone’s SD card.

          I could go fully offline with my music, but I don’t want to. I love music and I don’t mind paying. If movie/TV streaming had the same idea, I’d support that, too.

          I think a better example of your situation was exactly what happened with Yellowstone. That was made by Paramount, but it wasn’t available on their streaming service, because they wanted it exclusive to their cable TV channel. That’s why all the stupid spinoffs exist, because those are on the streaming service. Paramount owns all of it but it can’t put all the Yellowstone content in one place. Personally, I liked it until Kevin Costner dipped out. I’m curious about some of the newer spinoffs, but the whole situation has just left a bad taste in my mouth, and there’s better stuff out there. Also, Taylor Sheridan’s work has gotten so diluted over the years. He spread himself too thin. His movies, Hell or High Water and Wind River still hold up, as do the first couple seasons of Yellowstone (I’d say, until the big assassination attempt season ending). None of the spinoffs I’ve seen were very good. I watched the first standalone, and the first season of the second one (both named after years).

    • 14th_cylon@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      19 hours ago

      just out of curiosity. who do you think pays for the service, if you insist on getting it for free?

      • dubs@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        19 hours ago

        I feel like I’m not really understanding the question, but here ya go: The people who are willing to pay for it.

        • 14th_cylon@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 hours ago

          The people who are willing to pay for it.

          which, in this case, is the ad agency. hence the ad commenter i was replying to pretends seeing for the first time…

        • 14th_cylon@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 hours ago

          they clearly don’t. judging from the fact they need to supplement the income by selling ads (and also by what their subscription actually offers, which is… vpn and “ai”)

        • 14th_cylon@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          10 hours ago

          the commenter i was replying to clearly does. if you don’t, all you had to do was shut up 🤷‍♂️