Because they hired that attorney? They should have to start over and hire a different attorney. They can sue the original attorney if they didn’t know anything about the deception.
You really understand nothing but act so confidently. Learn to experience empathy and read deeply into subjects before commenting. You know, like Chairman Mao says to do.
You didn’t read the article.
He’s being referred to a disciplinary committee. He will probably get a suspension for a period.
Also why should the defendant of the case have the case thrown out because of the attorney’s conduct?
Because they hired that attorney? They should have to start over and hire a different attorney. They can sue the original attorney if they didn’t know anything about the deception.
lol, you: he should have to suffer grave criminal punishment because his lawyer showed a lack of ethical behavior
You really have not thought this through
Starting over because you had flawed representation is hardly a punishment.
He should start over because he can hire someone who is actually competent this time. It’s basically a do-over.
You really understand nothing but act so confidently. Learn to experience empathy and read deeply into subjects before commenting. You know, like Chairman Mao says to do.
I think someone who hires a shitty lawyer should get a do-over. What’s wrong with that?
You pay for it.
So your solution is that he doesn’t get a second chance?
Why is it my responsibility to remake the legal system? What is you plan to make it more just?