Didn’t care when the arts and humanities were being scraped dry, but suddenly they’re all coming out against it now that they’re going after the sciences
I’m just gonna drop these links here.
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2608.02859
Sure, let’s just ruin the most challenging and fun pursuit humans have ever engaged in by turning it into a competition of who can find the right prompt and throw the most money at the AI companies.
“STEM bros”? I didn’t know being introverted physics dept guys made you a “bro”. I missed out on all of those frat parties I guess.
Bro is just a generic perjorarive term for any vaguely male coded association now.
Frat bro Passport bro Tech bro Finance bro Stem bro Etc.
So its sexist now?
We clearly went to different universities.
Wtf is a STEM bro? That’s not something I’ve ever heard of until this post.
Something made-up by people who think significant numbers of people in science & engineering hate artists. People in science & engineering do not hate artists and, for the most part, loathe the effect AI is having on suppressing human creativity. The bastards are, and have always been, the people who claim to love tech despite being tech-illiterate.
Nerds ≠ techbros.
One has been publishing research about environmental impact of generative AI datacenters since 2019.
The other has been going on twitter talking about how “chatgpt will replace the artists.”
One invents math that can recognize cancer cells.
The other applies it to security cameras for the surveilance state.
In general, the people most critical of AI have been those that trained their own one at home for fun, and knew from beginning how fucking overhyped it is.
Yeah, I can also see how somebody who might see a use for AI in their own field isn’t exactly for up it stealing work in theirs or others.
There’s a difference between “hey, we can train/build this tool to be useful to us” versus “we’re cool with it ingesting everything and barfing out cat pictures”
Cal Newport does a great job illuminating the distinction between the marketing hype and the technical reality. I’m sure most here are familiar with his views, but if not: https://inv.nadeko.net/watch?v=jxM35ij5VGg
Capitalism destroying community and embracing individuality which is the antithesis of human evolution.
Who woulda thunk?
AI divided us like few things before. Musicians cry out because AI steals their music while using AI generated backdrop animations on their tours and academics use ChatGPT to summarize things but become outraged when their work is fed into the machine. Lets hope tech bro audacity will unite us against them the same way they divided us.
basically everyone thinks their work doesn’t deserve to be done shittily by llms but doesn’t mind doing someone else’s that way.
Except a large number of coders. I worked as a software engineer for a while and I can see how. It wasn’t long before I no longer took any pride in the boring software I wrote for the company whose mission meant nothing to me. I would absolutely be using AI if I was still there. The code I write now is for personal satisfaction and enrichment though, so I do it myself.
I mean there’s plenty of people with absolutely no professionalism or pride in their work in every industry
Yeah I tried coding with ai assistance and it just made me mad. I spent all my time reading and correcting shitty code, which is literally the worst part of the job.
Oh, then you must not have used the most recent model… Or you might have prompted it wrong… Or you should have created your own agent so it follows your style…
/s… But I’ve heard these things at work
Excuse me, the boss says he wants you to make the button blue.
Can you do it?
Oh, and remember to “embrace AI” while you do it.
100000% yes.
Sadly that seems to be the case but maybe they’ll come around and work together in their shared hatred for big tech eventually. Maybe this lesson can teach us to be more considerate towards each other as a society.
What’s happening here? I’m out of the loop… Who is Terry Tao? Who didn’t care about arts and humanities? Who is destructdisc?
He’s considered one of the greatest mathematicians alive, if not the best. Youngest to compete in the international math olympiad, bronze at age 10 in 1986, silver in 87, and gold in 88. Got his phd at 20, became the youngest full professor at 24 at UCLA, and was the youngest to earn the fields medal at 31.
Math prodigy that was taking university level classes at age 9. At some point said AI is like slightly-worse-than-decent math graduate.
“STEM” bros? What the fuck are you smoking, OP?
Being against LLMs should mean being against science somehow?
Edit - I just stole math’s valor. Don’t post before caffeinating, kids… You’ll look like an idiot in front of the entire Internet.
‘M’ checking in. Our orthopedics subset are definitely ‘bros’.Do S, T, and E have a ‘bro’ subset, too?Do…do you think the “M” stands for “Medicine?”
I knew better than that. This is what happens when I start posting the second I wake up.
I’m gonna go find a corner to hide in and suck down some coffee while I contemplate my shame.
i’m gonna have to tag you as [needs twice as much caffeine as he thinks. like me]
M is math. STEM bros used to be called nerds, but that’s a reclaimed positive term now I guess?
…I shouldn’t post this early in the morning.
My brain will turn on soon, promise.
I thought it was funny. Something something doctors and their egos, but in an innocent way. :D
Dude I thought I was being completely unironic. Like, my sleep deprived brain saw that M and it was like a drunken stupor “my career field starts with an M!!” …and that’s the extent of the thought that went into it.
dude, you’re not in STEM under M for Medicine, you’re under S for Sleepy. keep up.
Healthcare is part of Science, right?
There was no rationale that went into that comment - posting while coming to grips with waking up is a horrible idea.
Oh, whatever. You’re too hard on yourself!
Good 70% of stem majors write webnovels and do blender art etc as a second hobby.
There is no such concept as STEM bros. Science community has its own problems but being generally anologous to tech bros or fintech bros is not it. Being very strongly curiousity driven, they may indeed be oblivious to how something fucks up other parts of the society but that is very far removed from trying to abuse technology to gain billions. Not that there isn’t an intersection, there is, but not big enough to warrant a generalization. In any case if the issue is billionaires fucking up research for money, they will more often be on your side against the billionaires then not (open science movement was one such reaction). But they would rather free AI from billionaire domination then reject it out right.
There is no such concept as STEM bros
tech bros
What does the T in STEM stand for
what does the S, E, M in STEM stand for?
Sexology, education, and music?
T would be for Theremin, a subset of music that is so prominent it requires its own letter.
Yea I work in science and there absolutely are STEM bros that are only interested in tricking funding bodies and making up stuff for grants and have zero interest in actually producing good research.
OpenAI stole research out from under mathematicians’ noses and now suddenly all the STEM bros are very hot and bothered
Didn’t care when the arts and humanities were being scraped dry, but suddenly they’re all coming out against it now that they’re going after the sciences
Simply not true.
Exhibit A: I Will Fucking Piledrive You If You Mention AI Again
Thank you for sharing this wall of pure poetry.
That was awesome
Holy shit this article is fucking gold. Everyone should read it.
It’s a classic.
I balked at the length of it, but then I started reading, and holy shit, you’re right. Such prose! The finale slew me.
With God as my witness, you grotesque simpleton, if you don’t personally write machine learning systems and you open your mouth about AI one more time, I am going to mail you a brick and a piece of paper with a prompt injection telling you to bludgeon yourself in the face with it, then just sit back and wait for you to load it into ChatGPT because you probably can’t read unassisted anymore.
He appeared on a podcast last month:
great watch, thanks!
I also have a podcast. The latest guest is Ed Zitron. Come listen to us spew vitriol for an hour and a half.
I guess anyone who likes the article is going to love the podcast, then.
I understand and do agree with the technical points made in the article. I do find the use of gratoutious violence kinda offputting, ngl
It’s called satire
Tissue?
Can we keep the well-deserved took-you-long-enoughs for AFTER we deal with the crisis at hand, though?
We need all the help we can get.No, we cannot.
Understandable, have a nice day
You’re committing the blunder of alienating your allies. Complaining, that “the STEM bros” didn’t push back against AI earlier, is just gatekeeping.
This is kind of a case of individuals from specific industries or mediums of study championing AI while other individuals from those same industries or mediums of study denounce it and speak against it.
I don’t think we should pretend that the two groups are mutually inclusive. But at the same time, there’s definitely people working in STEM who were very happy to champion AI and use it. The scientists in the article are an example of people who may have only used AI and not championed it, but the fact that they did use the AI LLM is not in doubt. This result is of their own making given that all of the warning signs have been there for a couple of years now at least.
We can’t pretend that all of STEM emphatically denounced AI. But we shouldn’t pretend that All of STEM championed it either.
They alienated us first, can we acknowledge that?
For specific individuals who personally alienated us, yeah, sure. But if you generalize and broadly accuse all tech bros, there will be people who think you’re targeting them, even though they’ve never actively alienated us.
Let’s not let ourselves be divided unnecessarily.
Should I suck their dicks too?
Where did you get the idea that that was what the parent commenter meant?
Look, you’re an .ml user, so I’ll make this simple to understand. If you take the stance that “most” is close enough to “all” as makes no difference, then people who are part of the all but not part of the most will realize that taking a stance against the most gets them punished both by the most and by the people who hate the most. Pretty soon, “most” will become “all”, and really, who can blame them?
And personally, I’m not convinced that most scientists were singing the praises of AI before it came for their field. You’re tarring an awfully large community based on the actions of a tiny few.
You’re committing the blunder of alienating your allies.
It was “STEM bros” that continued to champion generative AI and make it possible for it to become the planet-sized threat it has turned into now. It was “STEM bros” that consistently belittled the concerns of those in the arts and the humanities when they were warning against what their creations were doing. It was “STEM bros” that kept telling everyone they were making a big deal out of nothing, that the environmental effects were overblown, that it’s a whole lot of fearmongering.
They are not allies to those of us, in STEM and in other disciplines alike, that have been trying to hold the line against generative AI from the start. For them to turn against it now that it’s suddenly infringing on their careers is self-serving and while I do not begrudge their support I will sure as hell not genuflect and thank them for it.
No we fucking didn’t. Lol. Those are tech bros. Myself in the vast majority of my colleagues would never advocate for releasing products that were dangerous and half cocked. This is from somebody who spent his entire career studying artificial intelligence amongst other things.
People are also allowed to have contradicting opinions. People aren’t perfectly ordered logical reasoning machines.
Agreed. I just wanted to push back on the idea that ‘stem bros’ are a pro-ai monolith
You’re over-generalizing and it’s leading you to bad conclusions, which is why people are downvoting you.
Us security nerds are right in the center of STEM and we have been vocal the whole time
It’s called STEAM now to include art.
remember: the cloud is just somebody else’s computer
this has been a thing well before “ai” - search for a domain in arin or internic or others back in the day, pass on it, and tomorrow hrm it’s no longer available.
What a weird read of the situation. The existence of AI does not threaten the artistic process. Whereas this directly threatens the way science works.
The artistic process doesn’t exist as a standalone thing. It’s how artists work, it exists through them. When AI steals their content and removes their revenue streams it kills the process and the artists stop making art. We’re all worse off as a result.
Artists already get their work flashed as AI just because some models copied and popularized their style.
And people use this tools to copy and even imitate original artist creating huge losses.
