• rbos@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    @kindtoeveryone in another thread:

    The exact figures:

    735.5 MW AC 2,942 MWh

    Verified from Minnesota PUC and EQB.

    Also, overnight you won’t be needing the full output, I would guess. And I’m sure they can draw on other sources.

    • Mihies@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      So it is 3GWh. Better than 600MWh. While the power requirement during nights might be less, it’s still a problem, specially during winter (short days, clouds, heat pumps etc.). And you need to charge those batteries as well which significantly lowers the power output during the day.

        • Mihies@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Pumped hydro is better, but not available everywhere.

          Depending on geography, but yes, it’s rare that you have all requirements for it (hill, river etc.)

          I expect sodium-ion batteries to be the main type of storage going forward, but who knows?

          These certainly seem like the future. There is also fusion, but it won’t be feasible in near future if ever.