Video detailing how to 100% spot AI slop yourselves with your own brains.

  • TrackinDaKraken@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    The viewer needs to ask the question before they seek the answer. Lies depend as much on the viewer’s desire to believe as it does on the lie itself.

    There are already short videos that 95% of people would not question. And, I suspect everyone has already been fooled at least once by an image, no matter how skeptical.

    They who would fool us don’t need 100% of us to believe, there will always be “conspiracy nuts”, which is how they can dismiss those who ask. It doesn’t help at all that many people are knee-jerk calling anything suspicious to them “AI”. Not always because of something in the image, just that in their limited experience “that never happens”, so, “it must be AI”.

    If you’re out in the world, and you claim something is AI, give your reasons. Point out what you saw, don’t just do a drive-by comment, that makes it worse, not better.

    • otacon239@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      This one frustrates me for other reasons too. If you knew-jerk to calling everything AI, you aren’t actually trying to determine if it was an artist making it or if it’s generated, which only makes you worse at detecting the differences between them.

      I will sometimes stare at an image for 30+ seconds just to try and find which way I think I lean. If I’m not sure, I don’t call it out, but remain skeptical. We should always be trying to be vigilant and never just accept “that looks weird” as being “that’s AI”. There’s also always the chance it’s a real photo depending on context no matter how weird.

    • AnitaBonita@futurology.todayBanned from communityOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yeah yeah heard that before the whole “You can’t tell it’s actually AI” which is so dumb and wrong because it is transparently clear when it is an AI writting, speaking, or generating images. The signs are there clear as day if you know better. Just because most people don’t know better doesn’t mean it’s futile.

      • AnitaBonita@futurology.todayBanned from communityOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        They aren’t content with turning into a schizo with AI psychosis on their own. They need to get other people to follwo them. misery loves company and all that jazz…

      • AnitaBonita@futurology.todayBanned from communityOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        I bet most of their posts and comments are made with GenAI

        Edit: Aww Jeena did I hurt your wittle feewings? Calling you out on the fact that you are a slopper? Well too bad I’m not stopping.

        By the way this dipshit is posting AI slop in their comment images. Just look at their wonderful contribution to the news thread about the death of Norway’s king.