If its a tradeoff between a slightly less efficient bullshit machine and a more efficient bullshit machine, that’s also racist, then shouldn’t it be done?
Provide a product that isn’t racist. Your argument is basically “we have a great car that occasionally sexually assaults the driver, it’s a bit annoying for us to make it not do that and we think it would also make it a worse car”
If its a tradeoff between a slightly less efficient bullshit machine and a more efficient bullshit machine, that’s also racist, then shouldn’t it be done?
Since you do not value it anyway it is a trivial decision to you, but not to people who try to provide a good product.
Provide a product that isn’t racist. Your argument is basically “we have a great car that occasionally sexually assaults the driver, it’s a bit annoying for us to make it not do that and we think it would also make it a worse car”
The product works as advertised. It reproduces the typical response to the question without bothering a human.
So it would be acceptable to make a car that occasionally sexually assaults the driver because humans might also sexually assault someone. Got it.
No, cars aren’t supposed to emulate humans, but to locomote, safely ideally.