• hexabs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    Might be a silly question –
    Why not get taxed by selling it once and for all instead of paying interest on the loan against it for years.

    In the long run won’t interest surpass the one time tax?

    Also assuming they invest the surplus after the sale, it should be the cheaper option.

    • Capitao_Duarte@lemmy.eco.br
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      3 days ago

      Can’t say much about US, but in my country if you get 100k assured by an investment of 100k, for exemple, you pay 1.2% in the loan, but the investment keeps going up by 1.1%. So you pay 0.1% for the 100k. A LOT less that you’d pay if getting your own money back

      • hexabs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Sounds like a bank interest problem, no?

        If all I need to beat is 1.1% annual growth rateon my investments, I would take loans against most of my assets and turn a profit.

        Why the low interest rates in the banks in your country?

        • Capitao_Duarte@lemmy.eco.br
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          It’s not a low interest for everyone. But here its like this: of you pay, fine, at the end your money (invested) is yours to do what you want. If you don’t pay, the bank will keep your investment as payment. The investment is the way the bank assures you are going to pay. If you can’t put anything in the deal (car, house, investment) you’ll pay full interest, which could be anything. I see clients getting 6,5% interest all the time

    • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      They can get interest rates that are lower than the tax they would pay. Often, they hardly pay any interest at all.