Ireland’s Oireachtas AI Committee has called for smart glasses that can record people to be regulated over privacy concerns. The bigger question: should they be banned outright?

  • LordGimp@fedinsfw.app
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    I mean, no? Yes everyone hates on techbro things, but the possible benefit to the visually impaired cannot be understated. There shouldnt be a ban on ANY accessibility technology when it can help enrich the lives of those living with disabilities.

    Now, should it be heavily regulated? Absolutely. People like to make jokes about European countries and their licenses for everything, but this should be a licensed disability aid, not an off the shelf dudebro accessory.

    • fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      10 hours ago

      The data shouldn’t be stored, and shouldnt be procced remotaly.

      On device or person just in time processing. That would be fine for me.

  • 2ndDegreeOWO@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    If you’re going to make laws about this, you should get one step ahead and make those laws apply to all concealed recording devices.

    • yucandu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Then how will I secretly record my interactions with corporations, executives, or police? What about all those investigative journalism pieces that involve someone wearing a hidden camera to expose someone saying/doing something awful?

      Is THAT where all this is headed? Making it harder for people to secretly record the elite?

    • tpyo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      this account only has posts and no comments; each post using this style thumbnail which seems to be a summarization of a headline and includes the source at the bottom

        • BillyTheKid2@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          You should absolutely record the police. You can’t trust them. Look up videos of pull overs when the cop realizes there’s a dash cam.

          Camera stop cops and save lives.

          Get your tounge off of the jackboot…

  • Squizzy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    We will get this sorted in time for… bionic eyes to be on the consumer market. We do not respond quick, we do not knock big tech and we for sure do not follow guidance or what the people want.

  • yucandu@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Hidden cameras that you can wear and conceal have existed since the 90’s. This moral panic over smart glasses is weird, and I don’t even own them.

    • Carl@anarchist.nexus
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      A large part of the recent panic is about the fact that these new recording devices upload everything directly to a centralized server, where techbros can do waves arms in air vaguely with it.

      If someone wants to record with a hidden USB body cam, that’s strictly a privacy issue between them and whoever they’re recording. You record something onto a microSD, then plug that into your computer to view. You’re the only one dealing with the footage, unless you specifically make the decision to upload it somewhere else.

      But if you’re recording someone with smart glasses, it becomes a much bigger issue. Because your recording can be used to capture things like facial recognition data of everyone around you, for a third-party to use however they see fit.

      Your argument is like saying that a closed-circuit security camera system in a mom-n-pop store, and Flock cameras spread throughout the town are the same thing. They’re fundamentally different, because the former is only used by whoever set the cameras up. But the latter has repeatedly shown to be a pipeline for abuse.

    • fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Yeah but those were advertised as like gimmicks for weirdos (like me!)

      These are advertised for bros and also the recordings are shared with mega corps with Jensan Huang levels of trust to not screw it