The argument the mod writes is 👌

Update : there’s a new one that appears but, I’ve checked, that’s the same mod as the others

Update 2 : got contacted by the mod, overall sweet guy/gal we agree to disagree and keep the ban up, who said that Lemmy cannot be civil

    • shani66@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      27 days ago

      Man DBzer0 really sucks. That’s the one place I’ve been mass banned from (although it is because there was a troll using my name, but they never even responded to an unban request), I should check if it applies to the ai dumping communities too.

      • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        27 days ago

        same here, i checked the modlogs, and it was “troll whabaotism” but i found no original comment/post that triggered it. i think they just banned people who participated in a community they dint like.

    • seathru@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      27 days ago

      bdzer0’s claim to be anarchist yet wholly embracing AI is some cognitive dissonance that I cannot wrap my head around.

      • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        27 days ago

        they oddlly crossbanned me from multiple comms i dont vist at all, thier reason was a vague"whatabotism" i couldnt find the actual offense, checked the modlogs. so i think they did it like some reddit subs did. i participate din a comm they dint like and just crossbanned me.

      • Famko@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        27 days ago

        Genuinely my biggest gripe with their entire instance. How do they not realize that by using LLMs you rob yourself of the chance to gain new skills in art or coding?

        • mirshafie@europe.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          26 days ago

          I never trust taxi drivers who use an electronic map. Taxi drivers should know all of the streets by heart, and be able to accurately predict road congestion, like they did in the good old days. By using this evil navigation technology, their spatial awareness withers and it is just a shame.

          • kionay@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            26 days ago

            knowing streets and predicting road congestion are not creative acts, that is they are not creating something

            • mirshafie@europe.pub
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              26 days ago

              Wow, okay. I mean I was being sarcastic with my comment, but now I kinda regret it. Way to cheapen another profession’s talents and trade.

        • Rothe@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          26 days ago

          Plus the fact that they are literally sucking up to techbro billionaire oligarchs pushing this nonsense by doing so.

          I guess the techbro in them overrules the anarchist.

    • call_me_xale@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      27 days ago

      “stable_diffusion_furry”

      My dude, you’re in a subculture that basically revolves around human art and creativity. Get out of your ass.

  • TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    24 days ago

    And yet Star Trek still had to have a human being repeat all what the A.I. was saying to make sure that it wasn’t shite.

  • arotrios@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    27 days ago

    This isn’t about AI - that’s just an excuse.

    What they really didn’t want was a Tribble infestation, and well, given your username…you can see why they might want you to keep your distance…

  • Routhinator@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    27 days ago

    LCARS was a data access and retrieval system capable of doing calculations and simulations. It was not, I REPEAT, was not “artificial intelligence”. It did not try to act or sound sentient, it simply responded to commands and ran programs.

    • Taleya@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      26 days ago

      TOS had the m5, which went rogue and started attacking and blowing up other starships, and lower decks had the Texas class, which went rogue and started attacking other starships

    • VindictiveJudge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      26 days ago

      There is at least one instance where it was written as sapient in TNG. That was mostly for a joke, though. Specifically, there was a running gag in early TNG with Data getting a bit too into defining things and someone (usually Picard) would interrupt him with something along the lines of, “Thank you, Data, we get it.” In one scene, Data is alone and only talking to the computer, which gives the line there.

    • jj4211@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      26 days ago

      Though it could create intelligence. “Computer, make an opponent that can be better than data”. Ok, guess it’s time to make a sentient hologram then.

      • Routhinator@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        26 days ago

        But that could only be done if the method do so had been stored as a program in the databanks. In Voyager, when they try to replicate The Doctor; Harry writes a program and then tells the computer to run that program. When the hologram fails, he has to reprogram it and run again.

        • jj4211@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          26 days ago

          It’s not like Star Trek is the most consistent over time.

          In Voyager, they did tend to treat the Doctor with more care and show that it was a lot of hard work. By extension the other sentient holograms.

          In TNG, they absolutely just casually upgraded a run of the mill holodeck NPC to a sentient being with a single supremely vague directive.

    • AzuranAurora@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      27 days ago

      The censoring is also kinda readable underneath anyway, so it accomplished nothing even if the modlog wasn’t public.

  • hendrik@palaver.p3x.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    27 days ago

    Yeah, where is my ship computer anyway? The duotronic circuits, Holodeck Moriarty, an LCARS panel in the hallway and a pad in my readyroom? Why do I have to constantly refill the coffee beans, empty the collection container, do the descale program and the machine doesn’t just provide me with “coffee, black” whenever I like? Feels like it’s handing out even more quests to me than any Voyager storywriter could imagine. I’m also waiting for ages on tablets which can just flick over the app and data to my colleagues like in Stargate SG1.

    Edit: Also dunno, I can’t remember how in Star Trek, all the AI is done by big, nasty corporations. Gobbles up half the hardware so it becomes unaffordable to people and they build a big, dirty gas powered datacenter next to Picard’s family’s wineyard. And then Voyager’s ship computer ceases to work the moment they drop out of wifi range?! Did I miss those episodes?

  • hperrin@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    27 days ago

    The computers in Star Trek didn’t (normally) hallucinate, so they’re definitely not LLMs.

    • T156@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      27 days ago

      Not unless they caught a space disease, or someone had some cheese, anyway.