Val Kilmer will be the latest Hollywood star to be resurrected by AI. The acting legend, who died last year at age 65, will star in the drama As Deep As the Grave.

  • NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Fuck them. Val was a treasure, don’t besmirch him with this capitalist bullshit!

    Fuck this movie, whatever it is, I’ll rather rewatch The Salton Sea, instead.

    Also, watch The Salton Sea, it’s so under appreciated.

  • qwestjest78@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    3 days ago

    Here is what I find funny, there was years in the early 2000’s where he was alive and healthy and he was not getting great roles or as much attention.

    Now he is dead and they are trying to revive him. Like it feels so silly to try to bring back someone with AI to make it like he is alive and healthy again. Those days are gone. Executives are using AI to live in denial.

    • nickiwest@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      My recollection may be flawed, but I think he had a reputation for being difficult to work with, and that’s why the roles dried up.

  • tomkatt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    3 days ago

    This is utterly disgusting.

    will star in the drama As Deep As the Grave.

    Though at least the irony isn’t missed.

    • friend_of_satan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Reminds me of when some famous porn actress died and somebody set up a live cam for her that just showed dirt, bugs, and worms.

  • FanciestPants@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    3 days ago

    This is absolutely bullshit, but also half-assed cowardice. Like if you’re going to put dead people who cannot consent to the use of their image in your project, why not make Martin Luther King Jr the next T’challa in the MCU? Why not make Pope Benedict fight the mandelorian?

    • teft@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      Celebrity Deathmatch with AI figures might be ok but i’d prefer claymation for the nostalgia.

    • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      I mean… did you read the article? He really wanted to be in the film, and his family and estate think this is the right move and what he would have wanted. It wasn’t clear if they talked to him about it or not, but this isn’t just a blatant lets do it thing with no consideration.

  • Pommes_für_dein_Balg@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    3 days ago

    So a cartoon character is copyrighted for 75 years after the author dies, but someone’s actual visual clone can just be brought back from the dead and made to do whatever?

    • CaptDust@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      The Kilmer estate is signing off on it because they feel it’s an important film Val wanted to contribute to. Doesn’t make it any less gross for me, but at least there’s some oversight to his image I guess.

    • foodandart@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 days ago

      It’s the rights to a person’s likeness that can be made into a legal property that heirs can control.

      This is why you don’t see much marketing with, say, Elvis Presley’s actual face (he was an actor - marginally capable for certain, but one nonetheless) unless it will be allowed by his heirs.

      Look at it from the angle that an actor’s FACE is their performative trademark, in the same way a singer’s distinctive voice is theirs, or a writer’s words, or a musician’s composition.

  • teft@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    3 days ago

    Has anyone thought this through to its logical conclusion? If we’re constantly resurrecting old talent using AI, or whatever the tech du jour is, then won’t we stagnate culturally?

    • ian@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      3 days ago

      Culturally, scientifically, intelligently, you name it we’ve reached the peak. AI is just recycling what humans have thought and said, According to our new ai overlords we just coast from here

    • undeffeined@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      A global surveillance state, is the end goal. These uses of AI are merely to push that goal forward by giving use to the tool for the masses to accept more data centers

    • foodandart@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Culture isn’t defined by the use or abuse of AI.

      It’s a tool when used creatively with full public knowledge, and a weapon when it’s used to surreptitiously decieve.

      As an artists tool for seamlessly putting a character into a story, is it any different than how videogames are made with an actor’s face slapped onto another actor’s motion captured movements?

      It’s not like the aforementioned film producers are trying to hide their use of it.