Point to a comment where I show support for nazis. Strawman arguments is all you have to defend your points. Once again you fail to formulate an objective argument.
Point to a comment where I show support for nazis. Strawman arguments is all you have to defend your points. Once again you fail to formulate an objective argument.
Funny how calling someone a jackass is “insulting” to you, but you treat bigotry like fair game.
“Jackass” is indeed an insult, no need to put it between quotations. And here you accuse me of treating bigotry like fair game without proof. The truth is here Godot messed up and you aren’t willing to see that because it would expose you as a hypocrite. Remember Godot apologized for the incident, yet here you are defending it.
I didn’t read the articles, and don’t care about how they frame the issue. This is for the guy who asked what I was talking about.
Bruh, you a fuckin clown.
Perfect.
Donating money doesn’t give you free rein to be an asshole
If you think he was being an asshole in that sentence, then I guess we’re done here.
Nobody is against the removal of nazis.
They banned “developer” accounts who were being incredibly disruptive throwing a tantrum about the social media account celebrating games with a wide variety of perspectives. I don’t think there’s any actual evidence for them banning a single person who ever did anything useful
Sure, if by not doing anything useful you mean donating money to the project, and saying that the project should focus on the project [1].
They aren’t obligated to let you be in their community
Beautiful statement.
Don’t behave like a raging jackass and you won’t be called one. I’m not obligated to ignore bad behavior either. It’s perfectly OK to call bad people behaving badly bad people.
The fact is the mass banning was not justified, and people were not being “raging jackass”, no matter how many times you call them that. There’s a reason Godot apologized for the incident, yet you fail to see that.
You mean a few github accounts and a bunch of jerks on Discord, which you are bringing up on Lemmy?
No, I mean titanium level backer of the project. What does being on Lemmy matter?
You realize it’s open source and you don’t need their blessing to use it right?
Yes, everyone knows that. What they did is banned developer accounts, thus preventing you from contributing to it.
You’re not entitled to force people to deal with you being a raging jackass.
There it is. The community of inclusion once again unable to express their thoughts without insulting people. Almost comical, but I guess there’s nothing funny about hypocrisy.
That is until they kicked everyone out for being “nazis”
You sound insane. I’ve been using RCS with no issues from my iPhone. Of course you need to update your iPhone to the new iOS version to get the new features, what did you expect?
Can’t argue with that. Have a nice day.
So you’re saying a company should be prohibited from developing a product because it might be better than the competition? I don’t think you guys even realize what you’re advocating for.
Except you’re not dealing with anything. What do you think happens once Google sells Chrome? They release a new browser a month later, and it will be better than Chrome because nobody has the manpower to develop a web browser at the same speed as Google. This is a waste of time.
Yes, regulate the web browsers where you can just download librewolf or brave, but don’t do anything about the criminal ISPs and wireless network service providers.
Unironically, the Apple USB-C DAC is the best you can buy for that price. You’d have to go for something double or triple its price to get the same performance from any other dongle, specially at that size.
Pointing out their hypocrisy will not help anybody. The best you can do is sit down and watch this comedy from the sidelines.
I doubt somebody running from a government is taking their tips from wired.com
How is this better than just mapping GPS data to a hexagon and sending that to the third-party?
Yes, I get downvoted a lot on Lemmy, yet nobody seems to be able to say why I’m wrong on these issues. Users of Lemmy resort to downvoting when they can’t defend their arguments. It is a fact that humans are more eager to show their disapproval than approval for something, like in restaurant reviews, where the only people who bother to leave a review are those with bad experiences.
Also, I’d be wary of basing your opinion explicitly off what other people think. You need to formulate your own thoughts if you want to retain some sort of identity.