• surph_ninja@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    13 days ago

    Too bad private email access is essentially dead. Any service not requiring another email or phone number to sign up gets quickly shut down. A casualty in the war on whistleblowers.

  • dingdongitsabear@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    12 days ago

    anyone dunking on the article, this is pretty far away from a how-to-lilst; it’s more of a “think about these things if you haven’t up until now” and as such a net positive. wrong community for it, though.

    • Dessalines@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 days ago

      I read through the whole list, and monero was the only decent privacy recomendation I could find. Everything else was US-hosted. A lot of it was just recommendations from Apple and Google on “privacy” services they offer.

      No mention of syncthing, matrix, xmpp, even with sections dedicated to those categories.

      • pinkystew@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        13 days ago

        I read that monero is different from other cryptocurrencies and makes it harder to identify the individual to/from whom a transaction in is sent

        What is the difference and why do other cryptocurrencies not implement it?

        • RvTV95XBeo@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          13 days ago

          The core focus of early crypto was decentralization, not anonymity. Bitcoin is totally decentralized, but the entire premise is the blockchain contains a permanent irrefutable ledger of transactions. Basically everyone knows if Wallet A paid Wallet B. If you refill your wallet with anything remotely traceable, that means everyone knows YOU paid Wallet B, and similarly if wallet B has any ties to the real world, the lines are easy to connect.

          That’s not to say you can’t use it anonymously, but that was not the intent and thus it does anonymity poorly.

    • terminhell@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 days ago

      Iirc any cell phone is still capable of dialing 911(or equivalent) even without a sim. So id imagine carrier towers and gps could still find it. You’d basically have to keep the device in a ferriday bag. Which complicates actually using it.

      • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        13 days ago

        That is correct. Any cell phone sold in the United States by law is supposed to be able to dial 911 no matter whether they have a SIM card inserted or not and no matter whether they have service on a SIM card or not and also no matter whether one specific carrier in your area has no signal it will use the others instead. You may be a Verizon customer, but if you dial 911 and an AT&T tower picks up the call first, the AT&T network will serve that call instead.