Your account is self marked as a bot. You may have done this unintentionally. You shouldn’t mark yourself as a bot if you’re not unless you want people who have selected the “don’t show bots” option to not see your content.
Professional developer and amateur gardener located near Atlanta, GA in the USA.
Your account is self marked as a bot. You may have done this unintentionally. You shouldn’t mark yourself as a bot if you’re not unless you want people who have selected the “don’t show bots” option to not see your content.
I definitely saw someone named “TripleK” (not a euphemism, it wasn’t KKK) playing Secret Hitler on Board Game Simulator. They kept saying a bunch of racist shit. I remember saying “it’s called Secret Hitler, not obvious Hitler” lol. I tried reporting their account but don’t remember what happened.
That’s the only time I can ever specifically remember seeing someone being anti semitic on Steam. (Not saying it doesn’t happen more.)
At least it’s not “Source: I am a pedophile” lol
Alright, I found the name of what I was thinking of that sounds similar to what they’re suggesting: generative adversarial network (GAN).
The core idea of a GAN is based on the “indirect” training through the discriminator, another neural network that can tell how “realistic” the input seems, which itself is also being updated dynamically. This means that the generator is not trained to minimize the distance to a specific image, but rather to fool the discriminator. This enables the model to learn in an unsupervised manner.
When I said a “general purpose model that knows what children look like” I didn’t mean the classification model from the article. I meant a normal, general purpose image generation model. When I said “that knows what children look like” I mean part of its training set is on children, because it’s sort of trained a little on everything. When I said “pornographic model” I mean a model trained exclusively on NSFW content (and not including any CSAM, but that may be generous depending on how much care was out into the model’s creation).
SecureBoot.
The model I use (I forget the name) popped out something pretty sus once. I wouldn’t describe it as CP, but it was definitely weird enough to really make me uncomfortable. It’s the only thing it ever made that I immediately deleted and removed from the recycling bin too lol.
The point I’m making is that this isn’t as far fetched as you believe.
Plus, you can merge models. Get a general purpose model that knows what children look like, a general purpose pornographic model, merge them, then start generating and selecting images based on Thorn’s classifier.
There is a method of training where you use one system to make things and another to detect them. I forget the name of this approach, but it definitely is an approach.
This sort of rhetoric really bothers me. Especially when you consider that there are real adult women with disorders that make them appear prepubescent. Whether that’s appropriate for pornography is a different conversation, but the idea that anyone interested in them is a pedophile is really disgusting. That is a real, human, adult woman and some people say anyone who wants to live them is a monster. Just imagine someone telling you that anyone who wants to love you is a monster and that they’re actually protecting you.
It could also, of course, make mistakes, but Kevin Guo, Hive’s CEO, told Ars that extensive testing was conducted to reduce false positives or negatives substantially. While he wouldn’t share stats, he said that platforms would not be interested in a tool where “99 out of a hundred things the tool is flagging aren’t correct.”
I take this to mean it is at least 1% accurate lol.
MS: I want to make Windows 11 require motherboard features that make ransomware attacks more difficult so I can say it’s more secure, even though it’s merely a feature of the motherboard.
Also MS: Sadly, if your tech doesn’t have these features you cannot upgrade and it will be insecure because I will not make updates for it.
It’s really wild looking back at what we considered acceptable in the Win 7 era versus now.
Well, you usually had to pay extra back then!
Could be that the AI is just vaporware they use to get funding from VCs while effectively being a normal clinic.
Opt out telemetry is annoying. There’s no guarantee it doesn’t send before I’ve had a chance to disable.
On that last post where someone got a refund they gave a full refund as a gift card and an additional 5 euro gift card.
(Not saying it’s an okay think to do, just in case you’re referencing it.)
It’s just deceptive wording. I think most people would view “selling our decisions based on your data” as “selling your data”.