• Corvidae@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    He decides and we pay? We’re not supposed to have a King, we’re supposed to have a legislature of representatives and senators, one of whose jobs is deciding whether to go to war. I have no idea what the democrats are going to do when they get back in office, but Trump has shown us that the checks and balances are little more than a voluntary agreement able to be ignored by the president as desired. The US Executive Branch needs a constitutional neutering.

    • arrow74@lemmy.zipOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s not that the checks and balances have no power, it’s that Republicans control all branches of government and refuse to stop him. They only work if they are used

      • Corvidae@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I understand you think that’s a distinction, I consider it one without much difference. If Repubs refuse to check him, then there are no checks on his power.

        • arrow74@lemmy.zipOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          That’s not how a system works. If I get on the freeway and rear end another car it’s not because my car doesn’t have brakes. My car does, but I just didn’t use them.

          It’s very important to understand that congress could stop this at any moment. They have the power to do so. The check is still there. However the majority supports all of this.

          • Corvidae@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            If the check is not used, it doesn’t matter whether it’s there or not. The republicans inaction can be simply explained via oligarchy or plutocracy and the wealth divide.

            • arrow74@lemmy.zipOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 days ago

              Isn’t the simplest explanation that these representatives agree with the actions? No need to overly complicate it.