Dutch human rights activist, Olax Outis had no “lawful defence” and was stopped from give a closing speech – but was acquitted by the jury in a verdict seen as a snub to a system complicit in Genocide.
I wonder if that had any impact on the result. Logic response would be the jurors applied the process based on the evidence but when the judge is clearly dismissive, it really leaves them no choice. But I am curious if the level of condescension by the was a major psychological factor.
I wonder if that had any impact on the result. Logic response would be the jurors applied the process based on the evidence but when the judge is clearly dismissive, it really leaves them no choice. But I am curious if the level of condescension by the was a major psychological factor.