The facts remain the facts no matter how they are twisted.
Lol, very rich of you to say that.
The fact is the claim about El-Sayed being a Dubai landlord is objectively true. It remains a fact, even if you try to twist it by claiming that anyone who acknowledges it is “aligning with fools and charlatans.”
Either way vote El-Sayed is the end of your point and that’s fine with me.
It absolutely is not. Whether you vote for him or not is trivial, whether you are honest or not is much more important. The end of my point is that you’re a liar and a hack, and that you’re not even good at being a lying hack.
Well don’t worry in the upcoming election of truth versus lies I’ll very much be on your side.
But in this specific election. The real one that actually exists, you’re serving Mike Rodgers. So feel free to list his myriad financial entanglements in the pursuit of truthfulness and fairness that you’re so obviously committed to.
I’m “serving” Mike Rodgers? Keep this up and people will be able to start saying that reality has a conservative bias.
I even said that I think people should vote for El-Sayed. But I also acknowledged something that is objectively true. If telling the truth is “serving” his opponent, if his path to winning depends on spreading lies and misinformation, then perhaps I should reconsider my assessment.
Some of us are more concerned with building a movement than on your petty electoral shit, and betraying people’s trust with misinformation is not a basis for a movement. Doing so in such a way that you instantly get caught, and then doubling down and admitting all of this openly, is not even helpful to the goal of winning an election.
So you’re a partisan hack and a liar, understood.
And a bad liar, at that. If you’re gonna lie, don’t do so in a way that you can get caught out and exposed so easily lmao.
I’m an objectivist.
If you want to align yourself with fools and charlitains to pretend you have some moral high ground be my guest.
The facts remain the facts no matter how they are twisted.
Either way vote El-Sayed is the end of your point and that’s fine with me.
Lol, very rich of you to say that.
The fact is the claim about El-Sayed being a Dubai landlord is objectively true. It remains a fact, even if you try to twist it by claiming that anyone who acknowledges it is “aligning with fools and charlatans.”
It absolutely is not. Whether you vote for him or not is trivial, whether you are honest or not is much more important. The end of my point is that you’re a liar and a hack, and that you’re not even good at being a lying hack.
Lol can’t wait to see what the “Honesty Senate” accomplishes.
I can’t wait to see what, “Hey everybody, I’m a liar, and I think you should vote for this guy” accomplishes.
See it’s the implication that truth exists that makes me see you as an ignorant child.
Might want to workshop it before you put that on the side of a bus.
As opposed to? What’s your bus slogan?
I don’t have one, I’m not the one promoting him.
Well don’t worry in the upcoming election of truth versus lies I’ll very much be on your side.
But in this specific election. The real one that actually exists, you’re serving Mike Rodgers. So feel free to list his myriad financial entanglements in the pursuit of truthfulness and fairness that you’re so obviously committed to.
I’m “serving” Mike Rodgers? Keep this up and people will be able to start saying that reality has a conservative bias.
I even said that I think people should vote for El-Sayed. But I also acknowledged something that is objectively true. If telling the truth is “serving” his opponent, if his path to winning depends on spreading lies and misinformation, then perhaps I should reconsider my assessment.
Some of us are more concerned with building a movement than on your petty electoral shit, and betraying people’s trust with misinformation is not a basis for a movement. Doing so in such a way that you instantly get caught, and then doubling down and admitting all of this openly, is not even helpful to the goal of winning an election.
“Petty electorial shit”
I fucking died laughing.
Build your non electorial movement then swine.
What a fascinating campaign strategy. First admit to being a liar, then call people who say to vote for your candidate “swine.”
The idea that an undecided voter followed us here is exactly the kind of ignorance that I find so intoxicatingly hysterical. Keep going!