The first one doesn’t really apply. This is a local source for an area that calls itself “The Villages”, so it’s like a Tennessee headline saying “Bristolian Sentanced…”
Most of the others are reasonable statements of fact that you are twisting in your commentary. Your second to last quote says she was moving at high speed, but you say it is minimizing her actions. The last quote describes an extremely abnormal action and presents it as such, but your commentary again acts as if there is some minimizing framing that doesn’t exist.
The punishment is far too light, but that has nothing to do with your criticism. The article is nothing more than a summary of court filings stated as fact since she did not dispute them.
The first one doesn’t really apply. This is a local source for an area that calls itself “The Villages”, so it’s like a Tennessee headline saying “Bristolian Sentanced…”
Most of the others are reasonable statements of fact that you are twisting in your commentary. Your second to last quote says she was moving at high speed, but you say it is minimizing her actions. The last quote describes an extremely abnormal action and presents it as such, but your commentary again acts as if there is some minimizing framing that doesn’t exist.
The punishment is far too light, but that has nothing to do with your criticism. The article is nothing more than a summary of court filings stated as fact since she did not dispute them.