Sure, if the starting position was 0 but that’s not the case. They are trying to cut spending because they are making huge losses. The financial situation in Finland is tough right now, really tough.
Governments spend less = other services get funded more, national deficit gets lower, taxes get reduced. Depending on what the government decides to spend the savings on.
I agree, but the article is about the Finnish government, unless there is something I don’t know they weren’t making any profit to begin with.
They’re just trying to spend less, which is functionally the same.
Sure, if the starting position was 0 but that’s not the case. They are trying to cut spending because they are making huge losses. The financial situation in Finland is tough right now, really tough.
Assuming the income stays the same
Corporations spend less = shareholders get richer
Governments spend less = other services get funded more, national deficit gets lower, taxes get reduced. Depending on what the government decides to spend the savings on.
How is it functionally the same?