• reddig33@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Thats a good point. If these were paid ads or the platform was paid to promote these posts in any way, I would think the platform wouldn’t be covered.

    If the platform was informed and didn’t take any action to remove the posts, that would probably also make a difference.

    • a_non_monotonic_function@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      In the latter case I think we’re getting perilously difficult to prove. I mean, the platform is likely to be the only ones that would have record of that anyway, right?

      Unfortunately I think this whole thing is just surrounded by too much plausible deniability especially given how much leeway tech companies are given to break the law these days.

      • showmeyourkizinti@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        No it’s pretty easy to send a notified cease and desist letter. And if you’ve got a couple of lawyers on retainer (like most celebrities do) someone in their firm will be happy to follow up with a lawsuit pretty quick.