• catdog@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    5 days ago

    Some ships would carry ammonia, hydrogen, etc.

    Still better than the status quo.

      • catdog@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        Yes, as far as I’m able to understand it, ammonia is quite promising for certain industrial purposes (and to run the tankers themselves). Engineer the right engine, and it could potentially run on ammonia while acting as a cracker. Temp store excess hydrogen, and use that for the second part of your journey (or sell it for onshore purposes).

      • catdog@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        Offshore wind and onshore solar excess can be used to produce hydrogen, not coal.

        It takes extra steps and introduces inefficiencies, but it is able to store larger amounts of energy than batteries, and can be used in certain industrial processes which do not run on wires and electrons.

        In a succesfully electrified world, it is likely that some ammonia and hydrogen is shipped around the world for such use cases. The main alternative is to keep using fossils.

    • UPGRAYEDD@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      5 days ago

      Also, those ships themselves cant run on batteries. So some fossil or liquid fuels would still be needed in some applications.