Not really, you present your argument as a false equivalence. Math equation:
(Blooming economy without loss of life) > (Temporary economic boom caused by war, resulting in loss of life, risk of losing power, post war inflation and needing to rebuild infrastructure to allow for the continuation of blooming economy without loss of life)
China want buyers for things that aren’t just weapons. They prefer using the weapons for themselves to threaten other countries in the eastern Asian seas
You do know what happens to the economy of countries that go to war, right?
By your own argument, China should be giddy about everyone else going to war.
Not really, you present your argument as a false equivalence. Math equation:
(Blooming economy without loss of life) > (Temporary economic boom caused by war, resulting in loss of life, risk of losing power, post war inflation and needing to rebuild infrastructure to allow for the continuation of blooming economy without loss of life)
but its a proxy war
China want buyers for things that aren’t just weapons. They prefer using the weapons for themselves to threaten other countries in the eastern Asian seas