• RobotToaster@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    His own party will still continue with abolishing jury trials, despite him being affected by the disastrous single justice procedure

    • Womble@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Do you really think that a jury should be convened for the matter of a £220 fine?

      • 0x0@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Definitely sounds better than whoever came up with this

        a system of “conveyor-belt justice”, in which magistrates decide on hundreds of cases a day, sometimes spending less than a minute on each

      • RobotToaster@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Absolutely. If the matter isn’t worth convening a jury for, it clearly isn’t important enough to be in court at all.