Opper
opper.ai
The developer platform for reliable agents

Screenshot of this question was making the rounds last week. But this article covers testing against all the well-known models out there.

Also includes outtakes on the ‘reasoning’ models.

  • NaibofTabr@infosec.pubEnglish
    317·
    3 days ago

    It’s no surprise public opinion is these tools are trash when the free models are unable to answer simple questions

    The tools are trash not because they are unreliable but because they are actively destroying human society and culture. They are destroying art, science, journalism, open source software, the internet at large, and the environment we all live in. It wouldn’t matter if the generative models were accurate, they would still be garbage.

    The fact that they are unreliable just serves to highlight what a colossally destructive waste of time and resources this entire exercise has been.

      • NaibofTabr@infosec.pubEnglish
        112·
        3 days ago

        The fact is AI can make as-good or better art than most “artists” because most “art” is just cookie-cutter shit for morons.

        This is an obvious misstatement. If you actually believe this then you’re not qualified to have opinions on art in general.

        “AI” (in this context meaning generative algorithms, because there is no intelligence) can no more “make art” than it can think, or care.

        • Iconoclast@feddit.ukEnglish
          2·
          3 days ago

          In computer science Artificial Intelligence refers to any system designed to perform tasks that would typically require human intelligence. That includes everything from playing chess to recognizing patterns, translating languages, or generating text.

          The first ever AI system was Logic Theorist written by Allen Newell in 1956.

          Trying to redefine terms is not helpful. GenAI is AI. It’s not misuse of the term.

          • tortina_original@lemmy.worldEnglish
            83·
            3 days ago

            Not sure at what point will you realize that what you quoted/said has absolutely nothing to do with the actual topic.

            Probably never.

              • atomicorange@lemmy.worldEnglish
                4·
                3 days ago

                Could you define what you mean when you say the word “art”? I think this may be a semantic disagreement. I think the people you’re arguing with are using a definition similar to “human creative expression” while you seem to mean something different.