Screenshot of this question was making the rounds last week. But this article covers testing against all the well-known models out there.
Also includes outtakes on the ‘reasoning’ models.
Screenshot of this question was making the rounds last week. But this article covers testing against all the well-known models out there.
Also includes outtakes on the ‘reasoning’ models.
This is an obvious misstatement. If you actually believe this then you’re not qualified to have opinions on art in general.
“AI” (in this context meaning generative algorithms, because there is no intelligence) can no more “make art” than it can think, or care.
In computer science Artificial Intelligence refers to any system designed to perform tasks that would typically require human intelligence. That includes everything from playing chess to recognizing patterns, translating languages, or generating text.
The first ever AI system was Logic Theorist written by Allen Newell in 1956.
Trying to redefine terms is not helpful. GenAI is AI. It’s not misuse of the term.
Removed by mod
Not sure at what point will you realize that what you quoted/said has absolutely nothing to do with the actual topic.
Probably never.
Removed by mod
Could you define what you mean when you say the word “art”? I think this may be a semantic disagreement. I think the people you’re arguing with are using a definition similar to “human creative expression” while you seem to mean something different.
Removed by mod
If you see it all the time, respectfully, you might be the problem. This isn’t effective communication.
Removed by mod