• couldhavebeenyou@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    4 days ago

    Sorry but whenever I hear this wording, I always imagine the porn lobby had a meeting one day to decide on a better word for ‘meat’ and they ended up on ‘talent’

    • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      4 days ago

      It’s standard film & television terminology. Not everyone sees sex work as demeaning, you know.

      • 9bananas@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        probably because “talent” is more specific:

        that would be like “why not call them dogs?” when talking about poodles…yes, it’s technically correct, but not really representative, is it?

        • slacktoid@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Depends on what the circumstances are. But it’s more of a reminder that while some of the talent in the arts are super rich they are still laborers.

      • couldhavebeenyou@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        I always used actor, singer, …

        Their way makes it seem like they’re the only ones there with talent lol