Privacy groups warn that flying plate readers could expand surveillance far beyond roadside cameras.

  • HCSOThrowaway@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    I wish you made this comment a while ago, because at this point I’m done discussing this due to all the bad faith shenanigans I’ve been getting here, so I’m not even going to bother reading it purely due to exhaustion.

    Have a good one.

    • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Eeh, fair enough I suppose. Basically optical fiber is impractical for police use, but these drones are a great use case for frequency hopping radios like what’s used in Ukraine.

      Unfortunately, that means the most likely counter to these available to the average person is going to be shotguns and flying other drones into them.

      • HCSOThrowaway@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        15 hours ago

        My main irritation that spurred the comment you replied to is in response to “heheheh drone interception is so easy, I personally invented 500 techniques.”

        I’m not a drone expert. Maybe you are. But that person clearly is not.

        • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          15 hours ago

          Oh no for sure, that guy’s talking nonsense. You can build a directed and relatively quite high power microwave antenna at home no problem - but building an n-tron (I’ll be fucked if I can remember which type of ‘-tron’ it is, I confess. Gravitron?) with enough power to take out a drone from more than a few meters away is well beyond what’s feasible to construct by yourself at home.