Gigabit goal “prejudicial” to satellite and wireless

Ah, so money changed hands. Got it.

  • chunk6235@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    111
    ·
    13 hours ago

    “Government abandons attempt to electrify lighting, says it’s unfair to flammable technologies”

    • tburkhol@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      7 hours ago

      In my brother’s neighborhood, more than half the houses have gas fueled porch lights. They burn 24/7, because no one wants to remember to turn the gas on/off with the sun or to light them every night. These are homes built in the last 40 years: the gas lights were a ‘quaint’ fad.

      • chunk6235@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Jfc… That’s mental, how long have they had those?

        I’d never be able to use that, I’d be too worried some shithead would manage to shatter the housing and start a fire

      • kestrel7_7@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 hours ago

        …OK but I used to work in a neighborhood where a bunch of people had actual, period exterior gaslights left over from the 19th century. They had been upgraded with digital timers and stuff. Automatic shut-off/restart. That’s ridiculous!

    • Carl@anarchist.nexus
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      44
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Believe it or not, there actually was an effort to block electric lighting. Because it was someone’s job to walk around the neighborhoods and light all of the streetlights. And “protect the jobs” has historically been a really awful argument against technology.

      • GraniteM@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        20 minutes ago

        An economist visits a site where a canal is being dug. He asks the foreman why the workers are digging with shovels, when a diesel-powered excavator could do the work of a hundred men. The foreman explains that the canal is a jobs project.

        The economist exclaims, “Why didn’t you say that it was a jobs project earlier?! These men should be digging with spoons!”

      • ynthrepic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Has the argument been awful, or just the outcome?

        I mean, when have those who lost their jobs due to technological obsolescence actually been looked after directly, rather than left to fend for themselves?