Ars Technica does not permit the publication of AI-generated material unless it is clearly labeled and presented for demonstration purposes. That rule is not optional, and it was not followed here.
Hm… yeah… i don’t know…
Also: https://bsky.app/profile/benjedwards.com/post/3mewgow6ch22p
They clearly did and do. Maybe they mean they don’t permit it to stay published once they find it.
But that sort of sloppy imprecise language is what I’d expect from them anyway.