Ars Technica does not permit the publication of AI-generated material unless it is clearly labeled and presented for demonstration purposes. That rule is not optional, and it was not followed here.

Hm… yeah… i don’t know…

Also: https://bsky.app/profile/benjedwards.com/post/3mewgow6ch22p

  • Sundray@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    3 days ago

    Well it looks like someone fell for the lie that LLMs increase productivity, silly goose. You have to spend more time correcting their mistakes than you save by not writing the article in the first place!

  • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 days ago

    Ars Technica does not permit the publication

    They clearly did and do. Maybe they mean they don’t permit it to stay published once they find it.

    But that sort of sloppy imprecise language is what I’d expect from them anyway.

  • zzz711@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    I like Ars and I enjoy Benj on Retronauts. That being said maybe the author whose just it is to report on AI shouldn’t have used AI in his writing process regardless of if he was sick or not.

    • Silic0n_Alph4@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 days ago

      Or… he was ill and made a stupid mistake as he should have been resting?

      Either it was a once-off or Ars will fuck up again. Guess we’ll see.

      • MountingSuspicion@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Is that how you would feel if he had just made up the quotes himself? Being sick is not an excuse to break journalistic integrity or company policy on AI. Being sick will afford you time off, or allowances for some mistakes (like typos or misattributions or editing errors), but in my opinion does not allow for AI use. If you cannot source quotes from a relatively short blog post but can think to ask Claude and ChatGPT I think that reflects very poorly on you in general. Why would you ask AI to do a task you should already know it’s bad at and not bother to check it? He was too sick to ctrl+F AI output but not too sick to ask one AI why the other AI wasn’t doing what it was asked? That’s a whole secondary task he would never have had to do if he just bothered to get the quotes himself.

        Using AI is not a mistake. That’s like saying an affair is a mistake. It’s something he can regret sure, but he didn’t accidentally open Claude and ChatGPT. He knowingly did something he should not have done. Being sick does not excuse that. I’m not saying it’s unforgivable, but there is a huge difference between what he did and other mistakes that other journalists have made.

  • verdi@tarte.nuage-libre.fr
    link
    fedilink
    Français
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    This is just yet another canary. We’re surrounded by idiots that will happily send society down the drain if it awards them extra money. Fuck this timeline.