More than a dozen food companies have urged the European Commission not to ban the use of words such as “sausage” and “burger” for non-meat products.

  • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    2 days ago

    The problem with being more permissive with naming is that the realistic outcome is simply gonna be that companies take the chance to deliver cheaper quality at the expense of the consumer.

    Like, if the requirement that milk actually has to be cow milk is loosened, what’s stopping the companies from just mixing the cow milk with water and selling that as “milk”?

    • crater2150@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      No one is planning to loosen any current rules, this is about a new law, that would ban names like soy milk.

      At least in Germany, even without the new ban, it was not allowed to call anything but cow milk simply “milk” without any prefix, and what you can add to cow milk is already regulated (https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milch-_und_Fettgesetz). Is it different where you live and currently milk is often watered down?

    • Riverside@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      If law wasn’t decided by a complicated system of books and men wearing tunics but by popular democracy, it would be obvious and would need no technicality that watering down milk would be illegal and selling almond milk as almond milk would be legal.