brianpeiris@lemmy.ca to Programming@programming.devEnglish · 17 hours agoAfter a routine code rejection, an AI agent published a hit piece on someone by namearstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square15linkfedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down10cross-posted to: fuck_ai@lemmy.world
arrow-up10arrow-down1external-linkAfter a routine code rejection, an AI agent published a hit piece on someone by namearstechnica.combrianpeiris@lemmy.ca to Programming@programming.devEnglish · 17 hours agomessage-square15linkfedilinkcross-posted to: fuck_ai@lemmy.world
minus-squareover_clox@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·15 hours agoI didn’t write the article, neither did OP. If the article is false, well so be it, but at least the supposedly false article was archived. Sometimes, even if an article proves to be false, readers in the future might still be curious what all the article said or claimed. 🤷
minus-squarebrianpeiris@lemmy.caOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·15 hours agoI think it’s best to leave the post link as is. I don’t want to point people to misinformation. I’ve added a post description instead with context and the archive link. If people downvote this post because of the 404, so be it.
minus-squareover_clox@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·14 hours agoThat’s actually the even more proper way to handle it, thanks for the update 👍
I didn’t write the article, neither did OP.
If the article is false, well so be it, but at least the supposedly false article was archived.
Sometimes, even if an article proves to be false, readers in the future might still be curious what all the article said or claimed.
🤷
I think it’s best to leave the post link as is. I don’t want to point people to misinformation. I’ve added a post description instead with context and the archive link. If people downvote this post because of the 404, so be it.
That’s actually the even more proper way to handle it, thanks for the update 👍