Somewhat, though fake also implies it isn’t actually intelligence. It’s a charade. Artificial intelligence does the opposite. They’re related, but I don’t think they’re technically synonymous.
the word artificial presents an an artificial dichotomy between the “natural” world and the “manmade” world. because we are neither animals nor part of the environment.
It’s a thing in the sense that unicorns are a thing. There aren’t any currently, but it’s a coherent concept. If they banned unicorns within city limits, the ban wouldn’t do anything unless someone managed to make a unicorn; same idea with ASI.
“Artificial Superintelligence (ASI) is a hypothetical stage of AI where a computer system surpasses the cognitive performance and problem-solving abilities of the most gifted human minds across every domain of interest.”
that’s an “industry term” in the same way that “panopticon” is a prison industry term, or that “brain in a vat” is a neurology term. It’s a name made up by science fiction writers and philosophers to describe a thing that does not exist, and has never existed. Might it exist in the future? Maybe, but that’s irrelevant to an issue of law. You can’t pass a law banning an ill-defined “panopticon”, because that isn’t a term of art enshrined in any US code.
because, as you say, it is purely hypothetical, such a law would be unenforceable, and would likely fail a test in court.
because it is, once again, nonexistent as of yet, the burden is on you to prove that they aren’t specifically referring to the term which the Shit lord of Hamberder enshrined in his executive declaration, because that use of “Superintelligence” actually has a basis in current US government parlance.
Ughh… don’t call it superintelligence. That’s not a thing.
bigly intelligence
ASI is an industry term. This is not Trump’s idiot SI.
I’ve studied AI for over half my life. No, it fucking isn’t and has never been.
Nobody fucking cares, bootlicker
So you’ll say anything the “industry” says? Even though it’s fake?
The term is real and has meaning. Doesn’t matter if you agree with that meaning, but it has nothing to do with Trump’s dumbass reimagining of “AI”.
The people pushing it the most are anti-intellectuals.
We need to call it fake intelligence.
That’s what it’s already called, “artificial” is a synonym for “fake” in most contexts.
Right, but artificial is a four syllable word, clearly beyond their grasp.
Somewhat, though fake also implies it isn’t actually intelligence. It’s a charade. Artificial intelligence does the opposite. They’re related, but I don’t think they’re technically synonymous.
the word artificial presents an an artificial dichotomy between the “natural” world and the “manmade” world. because we are neither animals nor part of the environment.
So, artificial?
Yes - maybe I should have been clear about what I was implying. Artificial is clearly too big of a word for them to understand.
Dont blame your goof on other people being stupid, own it.
Goof?
It’s a thing in the sense that unicorns are a thing. There aren’t any currently, but it’s a coherent concept. If they banned unicorns within city limits, the ban wouldn’t do anything unless someone managed to make a unicorn; same idea with ASI.
It’s a real term.
“Artificial Superintelligence (ASI) is a hypothetical stage of AI where a computer system surpasses the cognitive performance and problem-solving abilities of the most gifted human minds across every domain of interest.”
I really want to see how they measure the “cognitive performance” of an LLM…
I also want to know what part of problem solving exists outside of these tests, as it’s actually a core component of cognitive testing.
Seems like someone made shit up, I’m guessing using an LLM…
I suspect this is the point