Archived copy is here: https://archive.is/DqZ6m
The article says this:
“Immediately withdraw from NATO’s integrated command and then, in stages, from the organization itself. Reject the tribute demanded by the United States of 5% of GDP devoted to defense spending,” read France Unbowed’s 222-page program.
However, France under Mélenchon would still provide assistance to European Union countries under EU treaties, the document added
Is Melenchon right? Is it better for the EU to be the organisation of mutual defence guarantees for Europe, rather than NATO?
No, that isn’t even remotely true. NATO was in no way built to stop fascist strong men. Even a cursory look at the history of the 20th century shows that to be laughably untrue. Hell the biggest sponsor of fascist strong men in the 20th century was the United States so I cannot even fathom how you came to that conclusion.
NATO is, and was, a defensive alliance. This is not in dispute. You can look at the charter, this is spelled out explicitly.
source?