Can’t escape AI slop projects from meat proxies man. Every single open source project smells like Claude Code recently. Sad times.

    • Captain Beyond@linkage.ds8.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Rewriting stuff in rust was kind of a meme long before LLM’s. Rust also is famously a powerful language with a steep learning curve, the latter being irrelevant if you don’t actually have to bother to learn it.

      • NoDignity@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Yeah Rust is a fairly low level language like C/C++ which should usually give you similar performance once compiled. The reason Rust was made and had become somewhat popular even before LLMs is the language and compiler are very strict. This means it is much harder to introduce things like memory leaks and concurrency issues. However this also means that it is generally more difficult to work in and learn than C due to needing to work within those restrictions especially when trying to get a new project going. However that does mean if you are going to do most of the coding via LLM tools then those tools are bound by the same strict rules and thus less likely to introduce hard to fix/reproduce memory issues.

    • Grass@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      19 hours ago

      I’ve heard someone say its because the compiler explains errors more clearly than that of other languages and claude or whatever can correct it more easily

    • redditmodssucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      19
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Because wanna be programmers don’t want to learn a real language like c or c++ or anything else. Thats from what I hear from coworkers. I just use python, sql, and c++ for basic crap.

      • copingwithelmons@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Why is c++ a “real” language and not rust? It’s a tool. All programmers need to know logic above a specific language.

        • Bazoogle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          20 hours ago

          I guess being memory safe makes it not real. It’s only a real programming language if you can easily cause a BSOD and leave attack surfaces from improper memory handling.

        • redditmodssucks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          19 hours ago

          Yeah buddy I know logic and c and c++ are better lower level languages and they give you more understanding and freedom in you tool usage. Rust was made for people who don’t develop. Hope that helps you understand what I said more without you putting words in my mouth.

              • ducktumn@lemmy.zipOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                19 hours ago

                Yes? That comment is not disrespecting Rust. I think you should learn to read.

                • Spite_By_Design_LLC@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  6
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  18 hours ago

                  Oh, I read perfectly well. You praised Rust, then dismissed 99.99% of its projects as “slop”.

                  I think you should learn to formulate an argument without relying on ad-hominems and logical fallacies. Then you might have an opinion worth expressing.

                  • ducktumn@lemmy.zipOP
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    5
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    18 hours ago

                    Both can be true. Language is great. Users are mostly slop coders. What makes you think second invalidates the first?

                  • dx1@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    16 hours ago

                    “Ad hominem” is when you try to discredit an argument BY attacking its speaker. Someone saying something about you that you took negatively doesn’t mean they’re trying to attack your argument that way. They might just be changing the subject off of noticing problems with your approach.

      • MoffKalast@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Lmao cpp is not a real language, it’s c with a bunch of OOP bloat on top. Imagine calling React a language.