• tetris11@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    22 days ago

    But… doesn’t that multimodal distribution of topics/ethics still resolve to a unimodal Red/Blue vote in the end? In the end, it was an overall red-shift no?

    • wewbull@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      22 days ago

      No. When looking at a shadow of a bird flying, you can’t understand how the bird is really moving.

      In this case, the “centre-left” isn’t engaging on the issues that people face day to day. The right parties engage with them, but give fascist solutions. The fact that the problem is acknowledged attracts some people. Others it pushes to not vote. It looks like the population is moving right, but it actually that the electorate isn’t representable by the options available.

      • phutatorius@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        22 days ago

        The fact that the problem is acknowledged attracts some people.

        The “problems” the fascists claim to address are often fabricated by, or exacerbated by, the very same fascists. Small boats: irrelevant. Sharia-law-controlled no-go zones: fiction. Immigrants taking yer jerbs: a malicious lie. And the underlying reality is that all those “issues” are racist dogwhistles.

        It’s a fallacy to assert that gullible, low-information, brainwashed voters believe what they do because of legitimate grievances. They parrot what they’re told, and don’t have the critical thinking abilities needed to realise that they’re being manipulated.

        Fascists don’t get in by telling the truth on behalf of underserved groups. That’s their narrative, but like all fascist narratives, it’s a self-serving lie.

        • wewbull@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          21 days ago

          Trump addressed the cost of living in his campaign. Some people voted for him because he said he’d do something about it.

          He’ll make the problem worse, but he won votes because he talked about it.

      • TWeaK@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        22 days ago

        but it actually that the electorate isn’t representable by the options available.

        Bring on direct democracy. If our representives don’t represent us, we should get rid of the position.