• MJKee9@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Whenever you are using what someone is “known for’ as your criticism, you lose legitimacy to your argument. See, Scott Jennings intentionally tried to make Piker “known for” lynchings. The “known for” something critique is a Trump style attack…” Everybody is talking about how Obama was born in Africa. Sounds like we shouldn’t trust that guy.". It’s lazy and malicious.

    If you want to criticize Piker, do so for demonstrable conduct. All you did instead was signal to me your argument is bs.

    • SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      19
      ·
      15 hours ago

      He forms parasocial relationships with people for money like all twitch streamers or other streamers.

      You don’t have to believe it I’m not trying to change your mind.

      • Pinto, the Bean@lemmy.worldBanned from community
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 hours ago

        He forms parasocial relationships with people for money like all twitch streamers or other streamers.

        The para social relationship is you malding over someone who doesn’t know you exist.

      • WraithGear@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        14 hours ago

        and clowns do pratfalls to entertain people, or apparently, belittle people on lemmy to further their agenda.

        • SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          14 hours ago

          You’re calling me a clown so I think you’re the only one belittling people in this conversation.

          But by all means continue to do so if it makes you feel better.

          • WraithGear@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            14 hours ago

            only if you own the clause,

            for someone who asks why we should even consider him important, you are very consistent in your attempt at dismissing him as a person. probably because he it’s important, and his arguments are hard to assail.