I’ve been in London for the last month and have heard policymakers react to the wake up call Elon Musk just delivered. The decision of the U.S. to shut off intelligence and throttle the military v…
He wrote that nuh-uh they can’t, but if they ever find the testicular fortitude to stop tolerating his bullshit, then presumably courts will say ‘it’s their company.’ At best he can be CEO for life of an empty room with a scuffed Chromebook so he can cry about it on Twitter.
You know Starlink is limited to 100mph and, as a commercial satellite internet system, explicitly forbids its use for weapons, right?
Ukraine’s been spoofing geolocation on their Starlink terminals to get around this limitation, and SpaceX fixed the issue by monitoring how fast a terminal is switching between satellites.
Did you also know Starshield has no such limitations?
Which shareholders of SpaceX should be suing the shit out for Musk for.
It’s happening, he’s finally driving SpaceX in to the ground too.
They can fire him.
Can they? I hope they can.
While it’s mathematically possible, it’s very implausible. He owns 42% of the shares.
He wrote that nuh-uh they can’t, but if they ever find the testicular fortitude to stop tolerating his bullshit, then presumably courts will say ‘it’s their company.’ At best he can be CEO for life of an empty room with a scuffed Chromebook so he can cry about it on Twitter.
Nah, they can’t.
You know Starlink is limited to 100mph and, as a commercial satellite internet system, explicitly forbids its use for weapons, right?
Ukraine’s been spoofing geolocation on their Starlink terminals to get around this limitation, and SpaceX fixed the issue by monitoring how fast a terminal is switching between satellites.
Did you also know Starshield has no such limitations?
Did you know that Ukraine is specifically using the military version of Starlink so that this wouldn’t be a problem? What are you on about?
They use some starshield terminals. They mostly use starlink (cheaper).