Folk musician Murphy Campbell found herself at the center of a major ordeal when an entity called Timeless Sounds IR uploaded AI-generated imitations of her music to every major music platform, then used her recordings to strip her of her own income. According to sources, the scheme worked like this: someone fed YouTube videos of ... Read more
Simple legislative solution.
Anything generated by AI in full or partially, is not eligible be copy-righted.
and just like patents, prove you didn’t use AI via showing process of creation.
You can’t prove a negative.
Yeah, I would say the way to make this work would be that you have to promise that it doesn’t use AI tools. If there’s evidence, beyond a reasonable doubt, that you did, then you lose all copyright, from the past and future. Everything you’ve made becomes public domain.
The logical conclusion of that would be that nothing created after the introduction of “AI” will ever be copyrightable, which would be an amazingly ironic twist of jurisdiction.
I read that’s the position some courts have already taken, as they should.
Copyright can only be applied to a creative work, and that can only be created by a human being.
I think I need to know where Disney lands in this issue.
Though I guess it remains to be seen if they have the funds to fight the AI VC juggernaut that comprises basically all the growth in the American economy in the last 4 years.
i’m pretty sure this is the primary reason disney divested from AI video generation. they realized they couldn’t successfully lobby the law in to allow AI to own IP rights and be the primary beneficiary of that law.
That’s only half a solution, the artist still gets fucked
i mean the courts have already decided that, but it would be nice for the legislature to agree