worked on it since 1998

  • Theoriginalthon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 days ago

    I am interested, I thought you might provide a bit of insight, and I’m not arguing either way, honestly I couldn’t care either way as I’m not a digital artist.

    • Krudler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      2 days ago

      You can see that people don’t really want to know, what they want to do is to continue to believe that this tool is good. A tool that they did not build, they do not use, and they cannot evaluate against the comparative pro tools.

      I’m not wasting my breath on this bullshit.

      I’ve never in my entire life of professional digital media and development known an artist who would ever use gimp. Because it is utter feces.

      • TrickDacy@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        I’ve never in my entire life of professional digital media and development known an artist who would ever use gimp. Because it is utter feces.

        No, you’ve not known anyone who used it mainly because industries do not spend $600 on software per seat and then later admit that It was barely better than a free tool, even if that were true.

        You claim not to be trying to squabble but an objective observer would conclude that’s the only thing you’ve done here.