• ExtraJudgement@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    22 hours ago

    I’m all for constructive cooperation moving forward, as long as the UK never gets its special priviledges back.

      • abc@suppo.fi
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Euro is not a requirement of being in EU. See Sweden for instance.

        • FjordDan@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 hour ago

          The Euro was established by treaty in 1992, named in 1995, introduced in 1999 for accounting and as physical cash in 2002.

          Anyone joining the EU before 1992 could simply reject the Euro because it wasn’t a part of the deal when they joined. Only Denmark and United Kingdom opted out.

          Between 1992 and 1999 only 3 countries joined the EU. Finland and Austria decided to join the Eurozone. Sweden decided to “wait”.

          Anyone joining since then has to switch as soon as they meet the requirements.

          This leaves Sweden in a unique position, which is why nobody is giving them too much of a hard time for ensuring that they never technically fulfill the requirements for switching.

          • abc@suppo.fi
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            6 hours ago

            Oh, I didn’t know that. Thanks for brand new knowledge!

            • huppakee@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              2 hours ago

              Denmark is the only eu member who negotiated to not have to adopt the Euro ever. The UK was exempt too but I don’t expect they’ll get that back. There is much more worthwhile things to go for, and it’s not like the pound is as strong as it was in 2001 either.