That’s the amount of economic value AI will have to deliver to justify all the investment

  • HerbGrower@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 hours ago

    But don’t worry, its providing great new jobs for humans!

    AI agents rent a human, complete captchas for £0.02 per pack of 5.

  • ThunderComplex@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    6 hours ago

    This is pretty easily doable. If everyone who uses ChatGPT paid $6700 per month as a subscription fee then OpenAI could cover this cost alone. /s

  • justsomeguy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Bro please just 6 trilly bro we’re almost there I swear just 6 trillies per year and we good bro please

  • Sundray@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    5 hours ago

    So, either the bubble bursts and 99% of the sector’s value evaporates in a spectacular flash… or, one of these stochastic parrots turns into a magical genie that gives Sam Altman three wishes.

    He likes those odds!

    • pulsewidth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Which would suit me fine if it was just that sector’s value that evaporated. I’d be happy to never hear of OpenAI, Anthropic or even NVidia ever again. But it won’t just wipe them our, it’ll hit the vast array of banks, investment funds (including people’s superannuation and 401ks) funding them, and kill the world economy.

      It should still definitely happen though, and sooner rather than later, the longer it’s delayed the bigger the bubble gets and the longer the recovery is likely to be.

  • TootSweet@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Guys, it’s not a bubble. Super not a bubble. Totally, for sure not a bubble. Not even a little bit a bubble.

    (/s)

  • adarza@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    8 hours ago

    that’s more than the gdp of all but just two nations (usa, prc) on the entire planet.

    • andallthat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Might be… But then who’s going to pay those $6T to Anthropic and/or OpenAI when there is no longer an economy?

      • Dryad@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        31 minutes ago

        History has been consistent in showing that capitalism gives zero cares about long term consequences for short term profit.

      • HerrVorragend@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 hours ago

        I think it is non-manual labour that they want to replace. In their world, people will still have to earn money, but not with their brain or expertise but with their hands and/or bodies.

        • andallthat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Well, Robotics is (allegedly) making big progress too. Have you seen those robot dogs replacing security guards, self-driving cars replacing human drivers, or the level of automation reported in Chinese car factories? Even warfare has changed, largely automating the once manual job of murdering your neighbors.

          But that aside, even if manual labor still exists in this future automation dystopia, if it’s all that’s left, the economy will still shrink considerably.

    • Rothe@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      It is not going to though. And even if it was capable of that, it still wouldn’t provide them with anything near 6 trillions.